Aguilar v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al
Filing
9
ORDER denying plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/15/12. (kaj)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ADOLFO AGUILAR,
10
CASE NO. 11CV3030-LAB (jma)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
vs.
11
12
AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Aguilar alleges that Defendants America One Finance and First National Bank
16
misrepresented his1 actual income on a home loan application in order to approve a loan with
17
a “substantially high risk of default.” Aguilar did subsequently default on his loan. Now
18
before the Court is his motion for a preliminary injunction to stop Aurora Loan Services, the
19
loan servicer and holder of the deed of trust, from asserting ownership of his home and
20
evicting him from it.
21
Aguilar’s complaint isn’t completely clear about what he believes Aurora has done
22
wrong. As best the Court can tell, in January 2009 Aguilar and Aurora agreed to some kind
23
of loan modification, which Aguilar calls a “trial modification agreement.” Aguilar, for the next
24
three months, made payments to Aurora pursuant to that modification. Rather than stick with
25
this arrangement, however, Aguilar alleges that Aurora simply stopped working with him, and
26
on June 11, 2009 purchased his home (from itself, really) in a trustee’s sale. (Compl. ¶ 61.)
27
28
1
Aguilar’s complaint refers to Aguilar in the masculine and the feminine, but the Court
assumes Aguilar is a man. (See Compl. ¶¶ 56, 57.)
-1-
11CV3030
1
This story is straightforward enough, but other of Aguilar’s factual allegations confuse it.
2
First, in his complaint, filed on December 28, 2011, he claims that “Aurora is the servicer of
3
the note currently conducting a Trustee Sale on 7/18/2011 at 10:00 a.m.” (Compl. ¶ 7.)
4
Second, Aguilar alleges that “Aurora sold at public auction Debtor’s residence even though
5
Debtor and Debtor and Debtor’s counsel were actively negotiating a loan modification.”
6
(Compl. ¶ 18.) If Aurora sold Aguilar’s home, though, in August of last year, then why does
7
Aguilar seek a preliminary injunction to stop Aurora from asserting ownership?
8
To obtain a preliminary injunction, Aguilar “must establish that he is likely to succeed
9
on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief,
10
that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.”
11
Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365, 374 (2008). He has failed to satisfy
12
even the first prong. Rather than explain to the Court how or why he is likely to succeed on
13
the merits, he simply asserts that he is and then cites a completely unrelated case from this
14
district in which the Court found that a plaintiff was likely to succeed on her claims that she
15
did not receive statutorily mandated loan disclosures as required under TILA and RESPA.
16
See Moceri v. Plaza Home Mortgage, Case No. 11CV1060, Dkt. No. 4. Moreover, the Court
17
questions Aguilar’s basic story. He has offered no evidence that Aurora had some free-
18
floating obligation to modify his loan, no evidence that the “trial modification agreement” was
19
binding on Aurora, and no evidence, beyond his own declaration, of the agreement itself.
20
Looking at Aguilar’s complaint and preliminary injunction motion together, the Court
21
finds he has not shown that his claim against Aurora for breaching the covenant of good faith
22
and fair dealing is likely to succeed on the merits. His motion for a preliminary injunction is
23
therefore DENIED.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: February 15, 2012
26
27
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
28
-2-
11CV3030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?