Lillis v. Apria Healthcare et al

Filing 111

ORDER Denying 108 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/25/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE W. LILLIS, 11 12 13 14 vs. CASE NO. 12cv0052-GPC-KSC Plaintiff, APRIA HEALTHCARE, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [DKT. NO. 108] Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the reasons below, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 108.) DISCUSSION Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 108.) Generally, leave to amend should be freely granted and leave should be denied only on a clear showing that competing considerations outweigh the general policy. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a). Factors that could support denial of leave to amend include futility of the proposed amendment. Millar v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., 236 F. Supp. 2d 1110, 1113 (N.D. Cal. 2002). Here, Plaintiff seeks leave to amend his first amended complaint to “add additional parties, legal theories, and facts that came in light during the discovery process.” (Dkt. No. 108 at 2.) Upon review, the Court finds that the proposed second amended complaint is an exact duplication of the first amended complaint. (See -1- 12cv0052-GPC-KSC 1 Dkt. No. 108, Exhibit A “Proposed Second Amended Complaint.”) The proposed 2 second amended complaint does not add any new defendants, assert any new facts, 3 or allege any new causes of action. Accordingly, the Court finds the proposed 4 second amended complaint is futile. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the first 5 amended complaint is therefore DENIED. 6 SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: March 25, 2013 9 10 HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 12cv0052-GPC-KSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?