Monje v. Napolitano et al
Filing
8
ORDER Denying Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 (Re Doc. 1 ): The Court DENIES the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 as MOOT. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 7/3/2012. (mdc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FERNANDO MONJE,
11
Civil No.
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; ERIC HOLDER, ATTORNEY
GENERAL; ROBIN BAKER, DIRECTOR OF
SAN DIEGO FIELD OFFICE, U.S.
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
ENFORCEMENT; EL CENTE DETENTION
CENTER OFFICER IN CHARGE,
14
15
16
12cv242-AJB(JMA)
17
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Respondents.
18
Petitioner Fernando Monje, a detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland
19
Security (“DHS”)1, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, proceeding with counsel,
20
filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking to be released from
21
custody. Respondent filed a return to the petition on April 6, 2012. (Dkt. No. 6.) Petitioner did not
22
file a reply. After a thorough review of the papers and applicable law, the Court DENIES the
23
petition for writ of habeas corpus as MOOT.
24
Discussion
25
Petitioner is a native and citizen of Bolivia. (Dkt. No. 6, Resp’t Exs. at 1.) On April 7, 1997,
26
27
1
28
On March 1, 2003, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) was dissolved and its
functions were transferred to the Department of Homeland Security. See Casas-Castrillon v. Dept. of
Homeland Security, 535 F.3d 942, 945 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2008).
-1-
[Case# for Footer]
1
Petitioner became a lawful permanent resident of the United States. (Id.) On August 3, 2001 he was
2
convicted of credit card theft, credit card forgery, and credit card fraud. (Id. at 2-13.) On November
3
9, 2011, DHS placed Monje in removal proceedings on the basis of the 2001 convictions. (Id. at 17-
4
19.) Because he is an aggravated felon, Petitioner was subject to mandatory detention pending the
5
administrative phase of his removal proceedings. (Id. at 21-24.)
6
On February 25, 2011, the immigration judge (“IJ”) ordered Monje removed from the United
7
States to Bolivia. (Id. at 34.) On March 21, 2011, Petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration
8
Appeals (“BIA”) which remanded the case to the IJ for further proceedings. (Id. at 37-44.) On
9
August 31, 2011, in remanded proceedings, the IJ again ordered Petitioner removed from the United
10
States to Bolivia. (Id. at 46-58.) On December 22, 2011, the BIA denied Petitioner’s appeal. (Id. at
11
60-62.) On January 3, 2012, Petitioner petitioned for review with the Ninth Circuit and was granted
12
a temporary stay of removal. (Id. at 65.)
13
On January 30, 2012, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition. (Dkt. No.1.) On March 6,
14
2012, DHS moved the Immigration Court to schedule a custody hearing for Petitioner. (Dkt. No. 6,
15
Resp’t Exs. at 66-67.) On April 2, 2012, the IJ convened the requested custody hearing and set bond
16
at $7,500. (Id. at 68.) On April 3, 2012, Petitioner posted bond, and DHS released him from
17
custody. (Id. at 69.)
18
In its brief, Respondent argues that Petitioner has received the relief he sought by being
19
released on bond and the case is now moot. Petitioner has not filed an opposition. Petitioner
20
received a bond hearing, was granted bond, posted bond and released from custody. Accordingly,
21
the Court DENIES the petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as MOOT.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
DATED: July 3, 2012
25
26
Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia
U.S. District Judge
27
28
-2-
[Case# for Footer]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?