Cole v. Cate et al
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner's Amended Petition due 8/1/12. If Petitioner files an amended petition, the following briefing schedule applies: Respondent's Moti on to Dismiss due 9/14/12. If Respondent files a Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner's Opposition due 10/15/12. If Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioners claims, Respondent's Answer due 10/1/2012 Traverse by Petitioner due 11/1/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 6/26/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cge)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID COLE,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary,
15
16
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 12cv302-AJB (DHB)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS
[ECF No. 14]
17
On January 31, 2012, Petitioner David Cole, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a
18
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. On February 8, 2012, the Court issued a Briefing Schedule in
19
accordance with Rule 4 of the rules governing petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.
20
§2254. On May 9, 2012, Respondent filed an Answer. On June 11, 2012, Petitioner requested an
21
extension of time to file his Traverse. The Court granted the motion, and Petitioner was ordered to
22
file his Traverse no later than July 16, 2012. On June 14, 2012, Petitioner filed the instant Motion
23
to Amend his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (ECF No. 14.) In his request, Petitioner
24
represents that he recently discovered that he inadvertently omitted two exhausted claims. Petitioner
25
seeks to amend the present Petition to include these claims in order to save judicial resources.
26
Habeas petitions may be "amended or supplemented as provided in the rules of procedure
27
applicable to civil actions." 28 U.S.C. § 2242. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) provides
28
that leave to amend should be freely given "when justice so requires." Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).
12cv302-AJB (DHB)
1
However, leave to amend need not be granted where the amendment "would cause the opposing
2
party undue prejudice, is sought in bad faith, constitutes an exercise in futility, or creates undue
3
delay." Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobile Oil Co., 866 F.2d 1149, 1160 (9th Cir. 1989); Roth v.
4
Garcia Marquez, 942 F.2d 617, 628 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
The Court finds that Petitioner does not seek to amend his Petition in bad faith and that such
6
amendment would not unduly prejudice Respondent or create undue delay. In the interest of
7
assessing the merits of the Petition in its entirety, the Court finds good cause to grant Petitioner's
8
request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
9
1.
Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is
10
GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, captioned "First
11
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus," or before August 1, 2012. Petitioner shall include
12
all original and new claims in this Amended Petition. See Civil Local Rule 15.1 ("[E]very pleading
13
to which an amendment is permitted as a matter of right or has been allowed by court order, must
14
be retyped and filed so that it is complete in itself without reference to the superseded pleading. All
15
amended pleadings must contain copies of all exhibits referred to in such amended pleadings.").
16
17
If Petitioner does not file a First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by August 1,
2012, the Court will proceed on the original Petition.
18
19
2.
If Petitioner files a First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following
briefing schedule shall apply:
20
a.
Respondent shall file any motion to dismiss no later than September 14, 2012.
21
b.
If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner shall file his opposition, if any,
to the motion no later than October 15, 2012.
22
c.
23
If Respondent does not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court
24
reaching the merits of Petitioner’s claims, Respondent shall file and serve an answer
25
to the Petition no later than October 1, 2012.
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
12cv302-AJB (DHB)
1
d.
Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than November
2
1, 2012.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: June 26, 2012
5
DAVID H. BARTICK
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
12cv302-AJB (DHB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?