Doe v. San Diego, City of et al

Filing 366

ORDER Granting Supervisor Defendants' Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) 344 . Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants William Lansdowne, David Bejarano, Rudy Tai, Danny Hollister, Kevin Friedman, Victoria Binkerd, Robert Kanaski, Max Verduzco, and Jorge Guevara on all claims and issues alleged against them herein pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/20/2014. (vam)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE DOE, an individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al. Defendants. Case No.: 3:12-cv-689-MMA (DHB) ORDER GRANTING SUPERVISOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) [Doc. No. 344] 16 17 18 19 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) This action arises out of a March 8, 2011 incident in which Plaintiff Jane 20 Doe was sexually assaulted and battered by San Diego Police Department 21 Officer Anthony Arevalos. On March 27, 2014, the Court granted summary 22 judgment in favor of Arevalos’ past supervisors (the “Supervisor Defendants”) 23 on all claims asserted against them. [See Doc. No. 330.] Presently, the 24 Supervisor Defendants seek entry of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 25 Civil Procedure 54(b). [Doc. No. 344.] The motion is unopposed. 26 27 28 Under Rule 54(b), “the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly 1 12-cv-689 1 determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Here, 2 the Court’s ruling on the Supervisor Defendants’ summary judgment motion 3 adjudicated all claims against them. Moreover, there is no just reason for delay 4 in entering final judgment as to the Supervisor Defendants because the claims 5 asserted against them are separable from the remaining claims. Thus, good cause 6 appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Supervisor Defendants’ motion for 7 entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). 8 Accordingly, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of 9 Defendants William Lansdowne, David Bejarano, Rudy Tai, Danny Hollister, 10 Kevin Friedman, Victoria Binkerd, Robert Kanaski, Max Verduzco, and Jorge 11 Guevara on all claims and issues alleged against them herein pursuant to Federal 12 Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 Dated: May 20, 2014 _____________________________ Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 12-cv-689

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?