Castro v. Astrue

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Castro's motion for summary judgment 10 is denied and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment 11 is granted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/20/12.(kaj)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EVELYN CASTRO, 12 CASE NO. 12cv1194-LAB (MDD) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION vs. 13 14 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Castro challenges the denial of her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The challenge was referred to Magistrate Judge Dembin for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, after which Castro and the Commissioner filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Judge Dembin issued his R&R on November 8, 2012, finding for the Commissioner. The Court reviews an R&R on dispositive motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), which “makes clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. ReynaTapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Castro failed to object to the R&R. The R&R specified that any objections must be filed no later than November 28, 2012, and it warned that the failure to file any objections may waive the right to later raise them on appeal. -1- 12CV1194 1 In any event, the Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it is sound. It is therefore 2 ADOPTED. Castro’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED and the Commissioner’s 3 motion is GRANTED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 20, 2012 7 8 HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 12CV1194

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?