In re Michael Williams
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION Without Prejudice For Failing To Pay Filing Fee Required By 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) And/Or Failing To Move To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a): The Court GRANTS Plaintiff 45 days leave fr om the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee or complete and submit th e Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/2/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank IFP Motion form also was mailed to Plaintiff.) (mdc)
FILED'
I
2
[ JUL - 3 2012
3
1
":=n.u,.,8.rarl-N
4
BY
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
to
11
12
MICHAEL WILLIAMS,
CDCR # T-3010I,
Civil No.
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15
16
17
I2cvI449 WQH (NLS)
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FOR FAILING TO PAY
FILING FEE REQUIRED
BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR
FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
DR. A. SANGHA; JOHN DOE 1;
JOHN DOE 2; JANE AND/OR
JOHN DOES 1-50,
PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
Defendants.
18
19
20
Plaintiff, an inmate currently incarcerated at Centinela State Prison located in Imperial,
21
California, and proceeding pro se, initially filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
22
§ 1983 in the Northern District ofCalifornia. [ECF No.1.] United States District Judge Yvonne
23
Gonzalez Rogers determined that venue was proper in the Southern District of California and
24
transferred the matter on June 13,2012. After the matter was transferred, Plaintiff filed a First
25
Amended Complaint. [ECF No.7.]
26 I.
FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR REQUEST IFP STATUS
27
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the
28
United States, except an application for writ ofhabeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of$350. See
K\COMMON\EVER YONEtEFILE-PROSElWQmI2cvl449-dsm-no-pay-IFP.wpd
-1-
12cv1449 WQH (NLS)
1 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay this filing fee only
2
if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
3
§ 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes,493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook,
4
169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).
Because Plaintiffhas neither prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U. S. C. § 1914(a)
5
6 to commence a civil action; nor filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant
7 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), this action case must be dismissed pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Id
8 II.
Conclusion and Order
9
F or the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby:
10
11
12
DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350
(1)
filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and
(2)
GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to:
13
(a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed
14
IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period
15
preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. ClvLR 3.2(b).
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ofthe Court shall provide Plaintiffwith this
17
Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma
18
Pauperis." IfPlaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee or complete and submit the
19 enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, this action shall remain dismissed without
20
prejudice and without further Order of the Court.
21
22
DATED:
_~-'-f~t-:,~-+-v/....!-0_2._~ __
_
23
24
25
26
27
28
K:\COMMONIEVERYONEI_EFiLE-PROSE\WQH\12cv1449-dsm-no-pay-IFP, wpd
-2-
12cvl449 WQH (NLS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?