Chavira v. Bell
Filing
8
Order dismissing civil action as frivolous and denying 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as moot. Motion is Denied pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/20/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jao)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RUBEN MIJEL CHAVIRA,
CDCR #F-33253,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
Civil No.
D.W. BELL,
16
Defendant.
17
12cv1773 JLS (WVG)
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) AND DENYING
MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AS MOOT
(ECF No. 6)
18
19
Ruben Mijel Chavira (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison
20
located in Delano, California, and proceeding pro se, initially submitted a civil rights
21
Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Northern District of California. (Compl.,
22
ECF No. 1) U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilkin determined that venue was proper in the
23
Southern District of California and transferred the matter on July 17, 2012. (See Transfer
24
Order, ECF No. 3) Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C.
25
§ 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to
26
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (IFP Mot., ECF No. 6)
27
//
28
//
-1-
12cv1773 JLS (WVG)
1
I.
Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
2
As amended by The Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A obligates the
3
Court to review complaints filed by anyone “incarcerated or detained in any facility who is
4
accused of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the
5
terms or conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program,” “as soon
6
as practicable after docketing” and regardless of whether the prisoner prepays filing fees or
7
moves to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (c). The Court must sua sponte dismiss
8
prisoner complaints, or any portions thereof, which are frivolous, malicious, or fail to state a
9
claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621
10
F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010).
Plaintiff’s Complaint is subject to sua sponte dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
11
12
§ 1915A(b)(1) because it is duplicative of a Complaint he has already filed in another civil
13
action. Indeed, Plaintiff’s Complaint contains identical allegations against the same
14
defendants already brought before U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw in Chavira v. Bell,
15
S.D. Cal. Civil Case No. 11cv2858 DMS (RBB). A court “‘may take notice of proceedings
16
in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have
17
a direct relation to matters at issue.’” Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225 (9th Cir. 2007)
18
(quoting Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc., 285 F.3d 801, 803 n.2 (9th Cir. 2002)).
A prisoner’s complaint is considered frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) if it
19
20
“merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims.” Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d
21
1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995) (construing former 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)) (internal quotations
22
omitted) (citations omitted). Thus, because Plaintiff has already filed the same Complaint he
23
has filed in this action in Chavira v. Bell, S.D. Cal. Civil Case No. 11cv2858 DMS (RBB),
24
the Court hereby DISMISSES S.D. Cal. Civil Case No. 12cv1773 JLS (WVG) pursuant to
25
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). See Cato, 70 F.3d at 1105 n.2; Rhodes, 621 F.3d at 1004.
26
//
27
//
28
//
-2-
12cv1773 JLS (WVG)
1
II.
Conclusion and Order
2
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
Plaintiff’s Complaint in Civil Case No. 12cv1773 JLS (WVG) is DISMISSED as
4
frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF
5
No. 6) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall close the file.
6
7
8
9
DATED: August 20, 2012
Honorable Janis L. Sammartino
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
12cv1773 JLS (WVG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?