Askins et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 198

ORDER Granting 197 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Stipulation to Dismiss. It is ORDERED that the Parties Stipulated Settlement, which is hereby incorporated into this order, is approved. By incorporating the Stipulated Settlement in full into this order, the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulated Settlement according to its terms. Thus, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, given the Parties express agreement, this Court will retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulated Settlement consistent with the limitations set forth therein. Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 9/8/2020. (mme)

Case 3:12-cv-02600-AHG Document 198 Filed 09/08/20 PageID.2083 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

RAY ASKINS and CHRISTIAN
RAMIREZ,

12
13
14
15

Case No.: 3:12-cv-2600-AHG
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO APPROVE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
STIPULATION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.,

[ECF No. 197]

Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Motion

20

for Order of Approval, filed with the Court on September 8, 2020 (ECF No. 197). On

21

September 3, 2020, the District Court entered an Order of Reference (Consent to Magistrate

22

Judge Jurisdiction) (ECF No. 196). The Parties’ Joint Stipulation and Motion are,

23

accordingly, properly before this Court.

24
25

Having considered the Parties’ submission, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties’
Joint Motion (ECF No. 197).

26

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Parties’ Stipulated Settlement, which is

27

hereby incorporated into this order, is approved. By incorporating the Stipulated

28

Settlement in full into this order, the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the Stipulated
1
3:12-cv-2600-AHG

Case 3:12-cv-02600-AHG Document 198 Filed 09/08/20 PageID.2084 Page 2 of 2

1

Settlement according to its terms. Thus, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, given the

2

Parties’ express agreement, this Court will retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the

3

Stipulated Settlement consistent with the limitations set forth therein.

4
5
6

Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: September 8, 2020

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:12-cv-2600-AHG