Gomez et al v. McKesson Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER Granting Joint Motion To Dismiss The Claims Of Certain Plaintiffs Against Eli Lilly And Company Only (Re Dkt # 65 ): This dismissal is without prejudice for 60 days from the date of the entry of the order. Between the date of the Order and 60 days from the date of the Order, a Dismissed Plaintiff must refile in the appropriate United States District Court located in Plaintiff's home jurisdiction should they choose to reassert a claim against Lilly. If a Dismissed Plaintiff does not f ile a new complaint pursuant to Paragraph 2, this dismissal will automatically become a dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), effective on the 61st day after the date of the entry of the Order, without further court order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/4/2016. (mdc)

Download PDF
-,---., FILED MAR 04 2016 1 Cll' SOUTHEmi USplSl RICT COURT BY . ,DIS I RICT OF CALIFORNIA -acc..OEPUTY 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 DIXIE GOMEZ, et ai., Plaintiffs, 7 8 9 10 v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et ai., Defendants. Case No. 3: l2-cv-0281 6-WQH-NLS ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS AGAINST ELI LILLY AND COMPANY ONLY 11 IT-------------------------~ 12 13 The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the claims of certain 14 Plaintiffs ("Dismissed Plaintiffs") against Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly") in this 15 action. Being sufficiently advised, it is hereby:' "0~~, 16 ORDERED as follows: 17. l. 18 .-cO " I 2. 19 20 ;l The parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. This dismissal is without prejjudice for 60 days from the date of the , entry of the order on this motion (the "Ord~r"). 3. Between the date of the Order and 60 days from the date of the Order, 21 a Dismissed Plaintiff must refile iii-the appropriate United States Distdct Court 22 located in Plaintiffs home jurisdiction should they choose to reassert a claim 23 against Lilly. Any such complaint must include as an exhibit evidentiary support 24 of the Dismissed Plaintiffs use of product manufactured or sold by Lilly. 25 26 27 28 4. For any complaint filed pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 2 above, (a) all defenses to which Lilly was entitled as of the effective date of the original 1 2 . 3' 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 complaint in this action against Lilly are preserved, and (b) Lilly may not assert any statute of limitations defense based solely on the passage ()f time between the , effective date of the original complaint against Lilly and the filing of the complaint pursuant to Paragraph 2 above. 5. If a Dismissed Plaintiff does not file a new complaint pursuant to Paragraph 2 above, this dismissal will automatically become a dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), effective on the 61st day after the date of the entry of the Order, without further court order. 6. Each party will bear his, her, or its own fees and costs. 7. The Dismissed Plaintiffs are the following: 11 DISMISSED PLAINTIFFS 12 James DauE;herty Sandra Daugherty Deborah Davidson Ralph Davidson Rollie Deckard Georgia Lee Deckard James Dicarlo Evelyn Dicarlo Drew Dieterich Mary Dieterich Dorothy Dose John Dose Clarence Doty Jeannie Doty '"',. Edward Lentzx Dreikom, .JI / Jennifer Dreikom Cordell Duke Norma Duke George Dunn Linda Dunn Delores Ann Eller Robert Eller Daniel Encinas 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .. . 'i' . , ,.:' ,- ;:0- , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DISMISSED PLAINTIFFS Sandra Encinas Earl Femea Joanne Femea Edna Flanagan Edward Flanagan Beverly Fleck Howard Fleck James Fleetwood Joan Fleetwood Daniel Fluharty Terry Fluharty George Fox Rhesa Mae Fox Archie Franz Joan Franz Dona Frazier John Frazier 8. , , - The claims of the following Plaintiffs against Lilly in the above- captioned action remain pending: 16 17 18 19 20 REMAINING PLAINTIFFS Derrall Daniel Lechia Daniel Fred Donze Louise Donze Doyle Dunn " Janice Dunn Eugene Fields ! Patricia Ann Fields Dixie Gomez Florentino Gomez-Gonzalez , ,. " ! ""\' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: ~? The Honorable William Q. Hayes

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?