Ortega et al v. San Diego Police Department et al
Filing
216
AMENDED JUDGMENT in Favor of Defendants San Diego Police Department, the City of San Diego, and Jonathan McCarthy. The Court amends the prior Judgment to include an award of costs in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs, jointly and severally, in the amount of $38,402.06. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/29/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHAKINA ORTEGA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
CASE NO. 13cv87-LAB (JMA)
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS SAN DIEGO POLICE
DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF SAN
DIEGO, AND JONATHAN MCCARTHY
vs.
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPT., et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
Following a jury trial, this Court entered judgment in favor of Defendants San Diego
18
Police Department, the City of San Diego, and Jonathan McCarthy on March 24, 2017.
19
Dkt. 184. Defendants timely moved for costs in the amount of $40,526.80. Dkt. 186. The
20
Clerk taxed costs in Defendants’ favor in the amount of $38,402.06. Dkt. 196. On April
21
23, 2019, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court’s judgment. Dkt. 214. The Court therefore
22
amends the prior Judgment to include an award of costs in favor of Defendants and
23
against Plaintiffs, jointly and severally, in the amount of $38,402.06.
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 29, 2019
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
Chief United States District Judge
28
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?