Ortega et al v. San Diego Police Department et al

Filing 216

AMENDED JUDGMENT in Favor of Defendants San Diego Police Department, the City of San Diego, and Jonathan McCarthy. The Court amends the prior Judgment to include an award of costs in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs, jointly and severally, in the amount of $38,402.06. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/29/2019. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAKINA ORTEGA, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 CASE NO. 13cv87-LAB (JMA) AMENDED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, AND JONATHAN MCCARTHY vs. SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 Following a jury trial, this Court entered judgment in favor of Defendants San Diego 18 Police Department, the City of San Diego, and Jonathan McCarthy on March 24, 2017. 19 Dkt. 184. Defendants timely moved for costs in the amount of $40,526.80. Dkt. 186. The 20 Clerk taxed costs in Defendants’ favor in the amount of $38,402.06. Dkt. 196. On April 21 23, 2019, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court’s judgment. Dkt. 214. The Court therefore 22 amends the prior Judgment to include an award of costs in favor of Defendants and 23 against Plaintiffs, jointly and severally, in the amount of $38,402.06. 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2019 HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS Chief United States District Judge 28 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?