Ortega et al v. San Diego Police Department et al
Filing
87
ORDER Staying Proceedings Pending Appeal. This action is stayed pending the resolution of the appeal. The parties shall notify this Court immediately upon the issuance of a final order resolving the appeal. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 12/8/14.(kas)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
SHAKINA ORTEGA, et al.,
11
CASE NO. 13cv87-LAB (JMA)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER STAYING
PROCEEDINGS PENDING
APPEAL
12
13
14
15
16
17
vs.
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et
al.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
On November 19, 2014, Defendant Jonathan McCarthy filed a Notice of Interlocutory
Appeal, appealing this Court’s November 14, 2014 denial in part of summary judgment.
21
A district court may stay the action under its inherent powers to control its own docket
22
and to provide efficient adjudication of the cases pending before it. Leyva v. Certified
23
Grocers of California, Ltd., 593 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir. 1979). A stay pending the outcome
24
of the appeal will likely conserve judicial resources and promote judicial consistency. See
25
Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1112 (9th Cir. 2005) (recognizing the district court’s
26
ability to control its own docket, “particularly in this time of scarce judicial resources and
27
crowded dockets”).
28
///
-1-
13cv87
1
Accordingly, this action is STAYED pending the resolution of the appeal. The parties
2
shall notify this Court immediately upon the issuance of a final order resolving the appeal.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: December 8, 2014
6
7
8
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
13cv87
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?