Kenney v. San Diego, City of et al

Filing 700

ORDER: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) does not provide procedural grounds for the relief sought by Plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion for a new bill of costs hearing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is Denied. (ECF No. 698 ). Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 06/22/2018. (ajs)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN B. KENNEY,

Case No.: 13cv248-WQH-AGS
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

ORDER

KASEYLEE LAWRENCE; and
MATTHEW KOERBER,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

HAYES, Judge:
On June 18, 2018, Plaintiff John B. Kenney filed a motion titled “Pursuant to FRCP
Rule 60 Plaintiff Kenney’s Request for a New Hearing Date for Costs Due to Mistake;
&/or Alternatively Opposition &/or Objections to Defendants’ Application for Bill of
Costs.” (ECF No. 698). Plaintiff requests a new date for a telephonic bill of costs hearing
and states that he “mistakenly missed” the bill of costs hearing which took place on June
12, 2018. (ECF No. 698).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) does not provide procedural grounds for the
relief sought by Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s motion for a new bill of costs hearing under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is DENIED. (ECF No. 698). Any request regarding a new
1
13cv248-WQH-AGS

1

bill of costs hearing shall be made to S. Tweedle at the Office for the Clerk of Court at 619-

2

557-7349.

3

Dated: June 22, 2018

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
13cv248-WQH-AGS