Federal National Mortgage Association v. Hahn et al
Filing
5
ORDER Sua Sponte Remanding Case to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Because the case is remanded, this court will not reach Mr. Hahn's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/19/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)(cc: Superior Court)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
CASE NO. 13CV611
12
ORDER SUA SPONTE
REMANDING CASE
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
ROBERT G. HAHN and TERESA M.
FISKI,
15
Defendants.
16
17
This is an unlawful detainer action brought by Federal National Mortgage Association
18
against Robert G. Hahn and Teresa M. Fiski. Federal National Mortgage filed this case on
19
January 7, 2013, in California Superior Court, and Mr. Hahn removed it to this Court on
20
March 15, 2013.
21
Mr. Hahn based removal on federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
22
§ 1441, stating he raised a defense in his demurrer under the Protecting Tenants at
23
Foreclosure Act, 12 U.S.C. § 5220. However, federal question jurisdiction exists only when
24
a federal question appears on the face of the complaint. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482
25
U.S. 386, 392 (1987). Merely raising a federal defense in an answer or demurrer will not
26
suffice. See Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., 535 U.S. 826, 831 (2002).
27
Here, the complaint states only a state law claim for unlawful detainer. Therefore, the
28
Court sua sponte REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of
-1-
13CV611
1
San Diego. Because the case is remanded, this court will not reach Mr. Hahn’s motion to
2
proceed in forma pauperis.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 19, 2013
6
7
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
13CV611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?