Federal National Mortgage Association v. Hahn et al

Filing 5

ORDER Sua Sponte Remanding Case to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Because the case is remanded, this court will not reach Mr. Hahn's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/19/13. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kaj)(cc: Superior Court)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, CASE NO. 13CV611 12 ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. ROBERT G. HAHN and TERESA M. FISKI, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This is an unlawful detainer action brought by Federal National Mortgage Association 18 against Robert G. Hahn and Teresa M. Fiski. Federal National Mortgage filed this case on 19 January 7, 2013, in California Superior Court, and Mr. Hahn removed it to this Court on 20 March 15, 2013. 21 Mr. Hahn based removal on federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1441, stating he raised a defense in his demurrer under the Protecting Tenants at 23 Foreclosure Act, 12 U.S.C. § 5220. However, federal question jurisdiction exists only when 24 a federal question appears on the face of the complaint. See Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 25 U.S. 386, 392 (1987). Merely raising a federal defense in an answer or demurrer will not 26 suffice. See Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., 535 U.S. 826, 831 (2002). 27 Here, the complaint states only a state law claim for unlawful detainer. Therefore, the 28 Court sua sponte REMANDS this case to the Superior Court of California, County of -1- 13CV611 1 San Diego. Because the case is remanded, this court will not reach Mr. Hahn’s motion to 2 proceed in forma pauperis. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 19, 2013 6 7 HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 13CV611

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?