Martinez-Coutino v. USA
Filing
2
ORDER with Prejudice Dismissing Petition to Vacate under 28 USC 2255. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/20/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
)
)
)
Defendant-Petitioner, )
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff-Respondent. )
)
)
11 GERARDO MONSON-LOPEZ,
12
13
14
15
16
Criminal No. 12-CR-3944-L
Civil No.
13-CV-0621-L
ORDER DISMISSING WITH
PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF
SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255
17
On January 4, 2013, Petitioner Gerardo Monson-Lopez (“Petitioner”) filed a Motion for
18
Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner essentially requests that this
19
Court grant a downward departure of up to two points due to Petitioner’s immigration removal
20
status. The Court has reviewed the record in this case, which clearly establishes that on October
21
16, 2012, Petitioner waived both his right to appeal and to collaterally attack his conviction and
22
sentence. (Plea Agreement ¶ XI.) Petitioner’s motion raises no challenge to the validity of that
23
waiver, therefore this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider any collateral challenge to his
24
conviction and sentence. See Washington v. Lampert, 422 F.3d 864, 869-70 (9th Cir. 2005)
25
(recognizing that if sentencing agreement’s waiver of the right to file a federal habeas petition
26
was valid, district court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case).
27
///
28
1
Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion For Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2 2255 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5 DATED: March 20, 2013
6
M. James Lorenz
United States District Court Judge
7
8
COPIES TO:
9 PETITIONER
U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?