Mitchell v. Cate et al
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this case, he must submit, no later than June 7, 2013, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 4/2/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service-Petitioner also mailed blank in forma pauperis application)(vam)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL MITCHELL,
12
13
14
Civil No.
13-0634 DMS (MDD)
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MATTHEW CATE, Warden
Respondent.
15
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas
17
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, but has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to
18
move to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either
19
paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court DISMISSES the
20
case without prejudice. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. If Petitioner wishes to proceed
21
with this case, he must submit, no later than June 7, 2013, a copy of this Order with the $5.00
22
fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to
23
send Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 2, 2013
26
HON. DANA M. SABRAW
United States District Judge
27
28
C:\Users\moanam\AppData\Local\Temp\notesBF8557\13cv0634 dismiss.wpd, 4213
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?