Hopkins v. Paramo et al

Filing 2

ORDER Dismissing Civil Action Without Prejudice For Failing To Pay Filing Fee Required By 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) And/Or Failing To Move To Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a): The Court GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee and $50 administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. If Plaintiff chooses to file a Motion to Proceed IFP which the Court later grants, the $50 administrative fee will be waived. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/7/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service; per Order, a blank IFP motion form also was mailed to Plaintiff.) (mdc)

Download PDF
1 FILED 2 MAY - 7 2013 3 CLERK.).5. II SOUTHERt-.015:­ 4 BY 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 RANDALL ALBERT HOPKINS, CDCR #V-97737, Civil No. Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 16 17 13cv1019 WQH (MDD) I ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PAY I FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR FAILING TO'MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DANIEL PARAMO; K. SEIBEL; R. OLSON; ANIL KAUSHAL, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) Defendants. 18 19 20 Randall Albert Hopkins ("Plaintiff'), currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan 21 Correctional Facility located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil 22 action pursuant to 42 U.S.c. § 1983. 23 " I. 24 Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the 25 II United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350 26 II filing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). In addition, all parties filing civil actions must pay an 27 II additional administrative fee of$50. An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the 28 II filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 I:lEvefYOTle\~EFILE-PROSEIWQHll3cv I 019-dsm-no-pay-lFP.wpd -1- 13cvl019 WQH (MOD) 1 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez 2 v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). If a party is gmnted IFP status, the $50 3 administrative fee is waived. 4 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee and $50 administrative fee required to 5 commence a civil action, nor has he submitted a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 6 § 1915(a). Therefore, the action cannot yet proceed. Id. 7 II. Conclusion and Order 8 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 9 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 10 filing fee, along with the $50 administrative fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 11 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and 12 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: 13 (a) prepay the entire $350 civil filing fee and $50 administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and 14 file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for 15 II the 6-month period preceding the filing ofhis Complaint. See 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. 16 II ClvLR 3 .2(b). If Plaintiff chooses to file a Motion to Proceed IFP which the Court later grants, 1711 the $50 administrative fee will be waived. 18 II IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ofthe Court shall provide Plaintiffwith this 1911 Court's approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma 20 II Pauperis." If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $350 civil filing fee, along with the $50 21 II administrative fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, 22 II this action shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. 23 2411 DATED: f"h ~] I 25 26 27 28 I:lEveryonel_EFlLE-PROSElWQHl13cv 1019-dsm-no-pay-IFP_ wpd -2- 13cvl019 WQH (MDD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?