San Diego County Office of Education v. Pollock et al

Filing 120

ORDER: Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 2/2/2015 01:30 PM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 1/6/2015.(knb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18
19

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 13cv1647-BEN (BLM)
ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND
REQUIRING DESIGNATION OF
ATTENDEE

21
22

On January 5, 2015, the Court conducted a telephonic Case Management Conference to

23

discuss the status of the case and the parties’ settlement discussions. ECF No. 119. Amy R.

24

Levine, Esq. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant San Diego County Office of

25

Education, and Thomas S. Nelson, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendant/Counter-Claimant Julia

26

Pollock.

27

Based on the discussions with counsel for the parties, the Court finds it appropriate to set

28

a Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) on February 2, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. The MSC shall
13cv1647-BEN (BLM)

1

be conducted in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major located at 333 West

2

Broadway, Suite 1110, San Diego, CA 92101. All discussions at the MSC will be informal,

3

off the record, privileged, and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking party is

4

responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference.

5

a.

Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters for

6

insured defendants, and other representatives of a party having full and complete authority to

7

enter into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation,

8

must be present in person and legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case.

9

Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement

10

authority) will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the

11

immediate termination of the conference.

12

Unless there is good cause, persons required to attend the conference pursuant to this

13

Order shall not be excused from personal attendance. Requests for excuse from attendance

14

for good cause shall be made in writing at least three (3) court days prior to the

15

conference. Failure to appear in person at the MSC will be grounds for sanctions.

16

b.

Full Settlement Authority Required: In addition to counsel who will try

17

the case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority1 must be present for the

18

conference. In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the corporation

19

who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to

20

commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of Plaintiff's prayer (excluding punitive

21

damages prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can

22

settle the case during the course of the conference without consulting a superior.

23

///

24
25
26
27
28

1

"Full settlement authority" means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to
explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman
Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have "unfettered discretion
and authority" to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int'l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D.
Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference
contemplates that the person's view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A
limited or a sum certain of authority is not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan's Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-97 (8th
Cir. 2001).

2

13cv1647-BEN (BLM)

1

c.

Confidential Settlement Statements Required:

No later than

2

January 20, 2015, the parties shall submit directly to Magistrate Judge Major's chambers (via

3

hand delivery or email address [e-mail]) confidential settlement statements

4

no more than ten (10) pages in length. These confidential statements shall not be filed

5

or served on opposing counsel. Each party's confidential statement must set forth the party’s

6

statement of the case, identify controlling legal issues, concisely set out issues of liability and

7

damages, and shall set forth the party’s settlement position, including any previous settlement

8

negotiations, mediation sessions, or mediation efforts, the last offer or demand made by that

9

party, and a separate statement of the offer or demand the party is prepared to make at the MSC.

10

If a specific demand or offer for settlement cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted,

11

then the reasons therefore must be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be

12

in a position to state a demand or make an offer.

13
14

General statements that a party will "negotiate in good faith" is not a specific demand or
offer contemplated by this Order. It is assumed that all parties will negotiate in good faith.

15

d. The San Diego County Office of Education is further required to identify in writing

16

by name and title or position the representative with “full settlement authority” who will attend

17

the scheduled MSC. The required designation shall be made via a letter to the Court and to

18

opposing counsel no later than January 20, 2015.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

DATED: January 6, 2015

22
23
24

BARBARA L. MAJOR
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27
28

3

13cv1647-BEN (BLM)