Gates v. MCT Group, Inc. et al
Filing
5
ORDER finding as moot 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Vacating Motion Hearing. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/30/2013. (amk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KATHLEEN D. GATES,
11
12
13
14
15
vs.
MCT GROUP, INC., et al,
CASE NO. 13cv2611-MMA (DHB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING HEARING
DATE & DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
[Doc. No. 3]
Defendants.
On October 29, 2013, Plaintiff Kathleen D. Gates commenced this fair debt
16 collection action against Defendants MCT Group, Inc. and the Law Offices of Peter
17 W. Singer. See Doc. No. 1. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
18 complaint. See Doc. No. 3. The motion is currently set for hearing on January 6,
19 2014. In lieu of any opposition papers, Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended
20 Complaint. See Doc. No. 4. The complaint which Defendants move to dismiss is no
21 longer the operative pleading in this action, as an amended complaint supersedes the
22 original complaint. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997);
23 King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). Thus, Defendants’ motion has
24 become moot. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the previously scheduled motion
25 hearing and DENIES AS MOOT Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s original
26 complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28 DATE: December 30, 2013
____________________________________
Hon. Michael M. Anello, U.S. District Judge
-1-
13cv2611
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?