Watkins v. Sherman
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/22/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TERRENCE WATKINS,
CASE NO. 14-cv-260-LAB-BGS
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
STU SHERMAN,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Watkins filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
(Docket no. 1.) Magistrate Judge Skomal issued a report and recommendation on Watkins'
Petition, recommending that it be denied. (Docket no. 14.) The Court adopted the report and
recommendation. (Docket no. 18.)
A certificate of appealability must be obtained by a petitioner in order to pursue an
appeal from a final order in a Section 2254 habeas corpus proceeding. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A); Fed R. App. P. 22(b). Pursuant to Rule11 of the Federal Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases, "[t]he district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when
it enters a final order adverse to the applicant." A certificate of appealability should be issued
only where the petition presents "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right."
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). It must appear that reasonable jurists could find the district court's
assessment of the petitioner's constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
14-CV-260
1
In this case, the Court finds that Petitioner did not make a substantial showing of the
2
denial of a constitutional right, the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason, and a
3
court could not resolve the issues in a different manner. See Miller–El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.
4
322, 327 (2003). The Court DENIES a certificate of appealability.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 22, 2015
7
8
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
14-CV-260
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?