Murillo v. Taylor et al
Filing
3
ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and DISMISSING Case Without Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to pay the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or complete and file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Plaintiff provided new IFP Form. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/14/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RAMON MURILLO,
CDCR #P-43503,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
Civil No.
T. TAYLOR, et al.,
14cv0876 GPC (KSC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
[ECF No. 2]
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at Corcoran State Prison located in
20 Corcoran, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42
21 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff has not prepaid the filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a);
22 instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
23 § 1915(a) [ECF No. 2].
24 I.
MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
25
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United
26 States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400.1 See 28
27
1
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May 1, 2013, must
28 pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of
Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule) (eff. May 1, 2013). However, the additional $50 administrative
C:\Users\lc1curiel\AppData\Local\Temp\notes8BFA41\~8258385.wpd
-1-
14cv0876 GPC (KSC)
1 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay only if the party is
2 granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See
3 Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176,
4 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). “Under the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], all prisoners who file
5 IFP civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee,” regardless of whether the action is
6 ultimately dismissed for any reason. See Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002)
7 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2)).
8
In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also
9 submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the
10 prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint....” 28 U.S.C.
11 § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment
12 of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the
13 average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the
14 prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter,
15 the institution having custody of the prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20%
16 of the preceding month’s income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, and
17 forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C.
18 § 1915(b)(2).
19
While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), he has
20 not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6-month period
21 immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL.
22 CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners “seeking to bring a civil action
23 ...without prepayment of fees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement
24 (or institutional equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
25 complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added).
26
27
28
fee is waived if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
C:\Users\lc1curiel\AppData\Local\Temp\notes8BFA41\~8258385.wpd
-2-
14cv0876 GPC (KSC)
1
Without Plaintiff’s trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the
2 appropriate amount of the filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of
3 this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
4 II.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
5
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that:
6
(1)
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP [ECF No. 2] is DENIED and the action is
7 DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C.
8 § 1914(a).
9
(2)
Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional forty-five (45) days from the date of this
10 Order to either: (1) pay the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) file a new
11 Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 612 month period preceding the filing of his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D.
13 CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a
15 Court-approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP” in this
16 matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files
17 the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust account statement
18 within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court.
19 DATED: April 14, 2014
20
HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C:\Users\lc1curiel\AppData\Local\Temp\notes8BFA41\~8258385.wpd
-3-
14cv0876 GPC (KSC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?