Sisneros v. Brown et al

Filing 3

ORDER: (1) Granting Plaintiff Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ); and (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint. The Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or his designee, must collect fr om Plaintiff's prison trust account the $350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from his account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income and forwarding payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, California Department of Cor rections and Rehabilitation, P.O. Box 942883, Sacramento, California, 94283-0001. The Clerk is directed to issue a summons and IFP Package as to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/18/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (srm)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

JOSEPH C. SISNEROS,
CDCR #F-17317,

Civil No. 14cv0891 GPC (RBB)
Plaintiff,

13

(1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF
LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
[Doc. No. 2]

14
15

vs.

16
17
18

AND
BROWN, Sergeant;
MENDEZ, Correctional Officer;
DAVIS, Dr., Psychiatrist;
KRITTMAN, Dr., Psychologist,

19
20

ORDER:

Defendants.

(2) DIRECTING U.S.
MARSHAL TO EFFECT
SERVICE OF COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO
FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3) AND
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

21
22

Joseph C. Sisneros (“Plaintiff”), who is currently incarcerated at Richard J.

23

Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se,

24

has filed a civil rights complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. No. 1).

25

Plaintiff claims several correctional and mental health officials at RJD acted with

26

deliberate indifference to his safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment in September

27

and October 2013 by placing him in a cell with another inmate who “bushwacked” him.

28

See Compl. at 3. Plaintiff alleges he was particularly vulnerable to attack based on his
1

14cv0891 GPC (RBB)

1

age and medical condition, and that before the attack, he had objected to the assignment

2

by reporting his cellmate’s “bizarre, erratic & crazy behavior.” Id. at 2-4. Plaintiff

3

alleges he was told he “had no choice,” and was “severely beaten” because “nothing was

4

done.” Id. at 4.

5

Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee; instead he has submitted certified

6

copies of his prison trust account statements, which the Court construes as his request

7

to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (Doc. No. 2).

8

I.

MOTION TO PROCEED IFP

9

All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the

10

United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of

11

$400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to

12

prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

13

§ 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, a

14

prisoner granted leave to proceed IFP remains obligated to pay the entire fee in

15

installments, regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C.

16

§ 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).

17

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act

18

(“PLRA”), a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a “certified copy of the

19

trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-

20

month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.”

21

§ 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified

22

trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average

23

monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly

24

balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner

25

has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution

28 U.S.C.

26

In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after
May 1, 2013, must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)
(Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule) (eff. May 1,
28 2013). However, the additional $50 administrative fee is waived if the plaintiff is
granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
1

27

2

14cv0891 GPC (RBB)

1

having custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of

2

the preceding month’s income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds

3

$10, and forwards those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28

4

U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

5

Plaintiff has submitted a certified copy of his trust account statements pursuant to

6

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1119. The

7

Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s statements, as well as the attached prison certificate issued

8

by an accounting officer at RJD verifying his available balances, and has determined that

9

Plaintiff has no available funds from which to pay filing fees at this time. See 28 U.S.C.

10

§ 1915(b)(4) (providing that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing

11

a civil action or appealing a civil action or criminal judgment for the reason that the

12

prisoner has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee.”);

13

Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850 (finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) acts as a “safety-valve”

14

preventing dismissal of a prisoner’s IFP case based solely on a “failure to pay . . . due to

15

the lack of funds available to him when payment is ordered.”).

16

Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP (Doc. No. 2) and

17

assesses no initial partial filing fee per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). However, the entire $350

18

balance of the filing fees mandated will be collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the

19

Court pursuant to the installment payment provisions set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

20

II.

SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b)

21

The PLRA also requires that the Court review complaints filed by all persons

22

proceeding IFP and by those, like Plaintiff, who are “incarcerated or detained in any

23

facility [and] accused of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of

24

criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or

25

diversionary program,” “as soon as practicable after docketing.”

26

§§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Under these statutes, the Court must sua sponte dismiss

27

complaints, or any portions thereof, which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim,

28

or which seek damages from defendants who are immune.
3

See 28 U.S.C.

See 28 U.S.C.
14cv0891 GPC (RBB)

1

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A; Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000)

2

(en banc) (§ 1915(e)(2)); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010)

3

(discussing 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)).

4

“[W]hen determining whether a complaint states a claim, a court must accept as

5

true all allegations of material fact and must construe those facts in the light most

6

favorable to the plaintiff.” Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); see also

7

Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that § 1915(e)(2)

8

“parallels the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)”). In addition, courts

9

“have an obligation where the petitioner is pro se, particularly in civil rights cases, to

10

construe the pleadings liberally and to afford the petitioner the benefit of any doubt.”

11

Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Bretz v. Kelman, 773

12

F.2d 1026, 1027 n.1 (9th Cir. 1985)). The court may not, however, “supply essential

13

elements of claims that were not initially pled.” Ivey v. Board of Regents of the

14

University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982).

15

As currently pleaded, the Court finds the allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint

16

sufficient to survive the sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and

17

1915A(b).2 See Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1126-27. Indeed, the Eighth Amendment requires

18

prison officials to take reasonable measures to guarantee the safety of inmates, and has

19

been interpreted to include the affirmative duty to protect prisoners. Farmer v. Brennan,

20

511 U.S. 825, 832-33, 837 (1994); Labatad v. Corrections Corp. of America, 714 F.3d

21

1155, 1161 (9th Cir. 2013).

22

Accordingly, the Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to U.S. Marshal service on his

23

behalf. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all

24

process, and perform all duties in [IFP] cases.”); FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3) (“[T]he court may

25

///

26
27

Plaintiff is cautioned that “the sua sponte screening and dismissal procedure is
cumulative of, and not a substitute for, any subsequent Rule 12(b)(6) motion that [a
28 defendant] may choose to bring.” Teahan v. Wilhelm, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1115, 1119 (S.D.
Cal. 2007).
2

4

14cv0891 GPC (RBB)

1

order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal . . . if the

2

plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.”).

3

III.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

4

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

1.

6
7

Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a) (Doc. No. 2).
2.

The Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and

8

Rehabilitation, or his designee, must collect from Plaintiff’s prison trust account the

9

$350 filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from his account in an

10

amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income and forwarding

11

payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in

12

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). ALL PAYMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY

13

IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS ACTION.

14

3.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Jeffrey

15

A. Beard, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, P.O. Box

16

942883, Sacramento, California, 94283-0001.

17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

18

4.

The Clerk is directed to issue a summons as to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc.

19

No. 1) upon Defendants and to forward it to Plaintiff along with a blank U.S. Marshal

20

Form 285 for each Defendant. In addition, the Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with

21

a certified copy of this Order and a certified copy of his Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and the

22

summons so that he may serve each named Defendant. Upon receipt of this “IFP

23

Package,” Plaintiff is directed to complete the Form 285s as completely and accurately

24

as possible, and to return them to the United States Marshal according to the instructions

25

provided by the Clerk in the letter accompanying his IFP package. Upon receipt, the

26

U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve a copy of the Complaint and summons upon each

27

Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on the USM Form 285s. All costs of service will be

28

advanced by the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3).
5

14cv0891 GPC (RBB)

1

5.

Defendants are thereafter ORDERED to reply to Plaintiff’s Complaint

2

within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

3

12(a). See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2) (while a defendant may occasionally be permitted

4

to “waive the right to reply to any action brought by a prisoner confined in any jail,

5

prison, or other correctional facility under section 1983,” once the Court has conducted

6

its sua sponte screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b), and thus,

7

has made a preliminary determination based on the face on the pleading alone that

8

Plaintiff has a “reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits,” the defendant is required

9

to respond).

10

6.

Plaintiff must serve upon the Defendants or, if appearance has been entered

11

by counsel, upon Defendants’ counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other

12

document submitted for consideration of the Court. Plaintiff must include with the

13

original paper to be filed with the Clerk of the Court a certificate stating the manner in

14

which a true and correct copy of any document was served on Defendants, or counsel for

15

Defendants, and the date of service. Any paper received by the Court which has not been

16

filed with the Clerk or which fails to include a Certificate of Service will be disregarded.

17
18
19
20

DATED: August 18, 2014
HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6

14cv0891 GPC (RBB)