Ontiveors v. Beaza, et al.,
Filing
16
ORDER Denying Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis And Dismissing Case Without Prejudice Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a) (Re Doc. 15 ): Plaintiff is granted an additional forty-five (45) days to either: (1) pay the entire $400 statutory an d administrative filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust account statement within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/22/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, along with a blank IFP motion form.) (mdc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Civil No.
MARTIN ONTIVEORS,
CDCR #AM-7636,
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
15
16
17
14cv0900 WQH (PCL)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
[ECF Doc. No. 15]
P. BEAZA; C. MIETO; R. ARIAS;
AMY MILLER,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Plaintiff, a prisoner currently incarcerated at Centinela State Prison located in Imperial,
22
California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
23
§ 1983. Plaintiff has not prepaid the filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he
24
has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [ECF
25
Doc. No. 15].
26 II I
27
III
28 I I I
I:\Bveryone~EF1LE-PROSB\WQH\14cv0900-Deny
IFP. wpd
-1-
140v0900 WQH (peL)
I
I.
MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
2
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court ofthe United
3
States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400. 1 See 28
4
U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is
S granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See
6 Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, lOS I (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176,
7
1177 (9th Cir. 1999). "Under the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], all prisoners who file
8
IFP civil actions must pay the full amount of the filing fee," regardless of whether the action is
9
ultimately dismissed for any reason. See Taylorv. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844,847 (9th Cir. 2002)
10
(citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(l) & (2)).
11
In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must also
12
submit a "certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the
13
prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing ofthe complaint...." 28 U.S.C.
14
§ 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment
15
of20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the
16
average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the
17
prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(l), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3dat850. Thereafter,
18
the institution having custody ofthe prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20%
19
ofthe preceding month's income, in any month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and
20
forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid.
21
§ 1915(b)(2).
See 28 U.S.C.
22
While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), he has
23
not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6-month period
24
immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 19I5(a)(2); S.D. CAL.
25
ClvLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners "seeking to bring a civil action
26
27
28
lIn addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May 1,2013, must
pay an additional administrative fee of$50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of
Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule) (eff. May 1,2013). However, the additional $50 administrative
fee is waived if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP. Id.
I:\Everyolle'-BFILE-PROSB\WQH\14cv0900.Veny IFP. wpd
-2-
14cv0900 WQH (peL)
1 ... without prepayment offees ... shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement
2
(or institutional equivalent) ... for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
3 complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis added).
Without Plaintiffs trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess the
4
5 appropriate amount of the filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate the prosecution of
6 this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
7 II.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
8
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that:
9
(1)
Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed IFP [ECF Doc. No. 15] is DENIED and the action
10
is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C.
11
§ 1914(a).
12
(2)
13
Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional forty-five (45) days from the date of this
Order to either: (1) pay the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) file a new
14 Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy ofhis trust account statement for the 615
monthperiodpreceding thefilingofhis Complaintpursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D.
16
CAL. ClvLR 3 .2(b).
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff with a
18
Court-approved form "Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed IFP" in this
19 matter. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files
20 the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy ofhis trust account statl!-ment
21
within 45 days, this action shall remained closed without further Order of the Court.
22
23
24
DATED:
_:L:0:~~7L~~V_
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
I:\Everyone\...EFILE-PROSE\WQH\14cv0900·Deny IFP. wpd
-3-
140v0900 WQH (PCL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?