Santos v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al

Filing 2

ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action Without Prejudice For Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days to pay the entire $400 filing and administrative fee in full, or complete and file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. Plaintiff provided new IFP Form. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 5/13/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)(jrd)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 WILLIAM SANTOS, Inmate Booking No. A200203238, Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS; BARACK OBAMA, 18 Civil No. 14cv0908 GPC (NLS) ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEES REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, currently detained at the Etowah County Detention Center in Gadsden, 25 Alabama, and proceeding pro se, filed a one-page complaint entitled “Civil Rights 26 Action with the Writ of Summons and Complaint” “under 42 U.S.C. § 1983” on April 27 15, 2014 (ECF Doc. No. 1). 28 / / / -1- 14cv0908 GPC (NLS) 1 I. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR REQUEST IFP STATUS 2 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of 3 the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee 4 of $400. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to 5 pay this filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 6 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th 7 Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). 8 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 in filing and administrative fees required to 9 commence a civil action, nor has he submitted a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 10 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, the case cannot yet proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); 11 Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 12 II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER 13 For the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby: 14 (1) DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the 15 $400 civil filing and administrative fee or submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 16 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a); and 17 (2) 18 filed to: GRANTS Plaintiff forty five (45) days leave from the date this Order is (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or 19 (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust 20 account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b). 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 23 with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to 24 Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May 1, 27 2013, must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), (b); Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, eff. May 1, 2013. However, 28 the additional $50 administrative fee is waived if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP. Id. -2- 14cv0908 GPC (NLS) 1 or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within that time, this action 2 shall remain dismissed without prejudice and without further Order of the Court. 3 4 5 6 DATED: May 13, 2014 HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 14cv0908 GPC (NLS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?