Gonzalez v. Unnamed Respondents
Filing
2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice: If Petitioner is a capital prisoner he may request to have this case reopened. If Petitioner is a non-capital prisoner, he may file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which will be given a separate civil case number. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 4/23/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, along with a blank 2254 Petition form, and a blank IFP Motion form.) (mdc)
'!:
•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSUE GONZALEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
Civil No.
vs.
14cvl004-WQH (DHB)
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UNNAMED,
Respondent.
15
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a document which has been
17
docketed as a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.c. § 2254, in which he
18
indicates that he is unclear regarding the timing of filing a habeas petition in this Court
19
challenging his state conviction.
20
Petitioner has not filed a Petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this action. Therefore,
21
unless Petitioner is a capital prisoner, he has not initiated habeas proceedings in this Court.
22
Calderon (Nicolaus) v. United States District Court, 98 F.3d 1102, 1107 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1996)
23
("Unlike non-capital prisoner who initiate habeas proceedings by filing a petition for a writ of
24
habeas corpus, capital prisoners commence federal habeas proceedings by filing a request for
25
appointment of counsel."); McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849 (1994).
26
Petitioner does not contend that he is a capital prisoner, that is, a prisoner under sentence
27
of death, and there is nothing in the documents he has submitted which indicates that he is a
28
capital prisoner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with a habeas action in this Court he must (as
1 :'C.~\..EFILE-PROSF.\WQII\I "'('\· I~-Di5n'l" ""l'Il"'l) l '"
-1-
14cvl 004
1
is the case with all non-capital prisoners) file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which will
2 be given a separate civil case number. However, if Petitioner is in fact a capital prisoner, he may
3 request the Court to re-open this action in order to permit him to file a Petition under the civil
4
case number as signed to this action.
5
Further, the Court cautions Petitioner that a one-year period of limitation applies to a
6
petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State
7
court. The limitation period begins to run on the latest of:
8
9
10
11
(A) the date on which the judgment became final by the
conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking
such review ;
(B) the date on which the impediment to filing an application
created by State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the
United States is removed, if the applicant was prevented from filing
by such State action;
12
13
14
15
16
17
(C) the date on which the constitutional right asserted was
initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if the right has been
newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively
applicable to cases on collateral review; or
(D) the date on which the factual predicate of the claim or
claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise
of due diligence.
28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(l)(A)-(D).
18
The statute of limitations is tolled while a properly filed state habeas corpus petition is
19
pending. 28 U.S.c. § 2244(d)(2); see Nino v. Galaza, 183 F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th Cir. 1999); cf.
20
Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8 (2000) (holding that "an application is 'properly filed' when its
21
delivery and acceptance [by the appropriate court officer for placement into the record] are in
22
compliance with the applicable laws and rules governing filings") ; Bonner v. Carey, 425 F.3d
23
1145, 1149 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that a state application for post-conviction relief which is
24
ultimately dismissed as untimely was neither "properly filed" nor "pending" while it was under
25
consideration by the state court, and therefore does not toll the statute of limitations), as
26
amended 439 F.3d 993. However, absent some other basis for tolling, the statute of limitations
27
continues to run while a federal habeas petition is pending. Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167,
28
181-82 (2001) .
-2-
14cvl004
1
Further, habeas petitioners who wish to challenge either their state court conviction or the
2 length of their confinement in state prison, must first exhaust state judicial remedies. 28 U .S.c.
3
§ 2254(b), (c); Granberry v. Greer, 481 U.S. 129, 133-34 (1987). To exhaust state judicial
4
remedies, a California state prisoner must present the California Supreme Court with a fair
5
opportunity to rule on the merits of every issue raised in his or her federal habeas petition. 28
6 U.S .c. § 2254(b), (c); Granberry, 481 U.S. at 133-34. Moreover, to properly exhaust state court
7
remedies a petitioner must allege, in state court, how one or more of his or her federal rights
8 have been violated. The Supreme Court in Duncan v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364 (1995) reasoned:
9 "If state courts are to be given the opportunity to correct alleged violations of prisoners' federal
10
rights, they must surely be alerted to the fact that the prisoners are asserting claims under the
11
United States Constitution." Id. at 365-66 (emphasis added). For example, "[i]f a habeas
12 petitioner wishes to claim that an evidentiary ruling at a state court trial denied him [or her] the
13
due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, he [or she] must say so, not only
14
in federal court, but in state court." Id. at 366 (emphasis added).
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
15
16
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice because Petitioner has not filed a Petition
17
and has therefore failed to initiate federal habeas proceedings in this action. If Petitioner is a
18
capital prisoner he may request to have this case reopened. If Petitioner is a non-capital prisoner,
19
he may file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which will be given a separate civil case
20
number. The Clerk of Court shall send Petitioner a blank Southern District of California form
21
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, and a blank Southern District
22
of California in forma pauperis application form.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 DATED:
¢~
Hon. W· am Q. Hayes
United S es District Judge
25
26
27
28
1 ·'l:.YI!f)'One\...EFILF..PIWS E\WO I I\ 14C'V 1 0(W ·D;-"'1'L~ ...,-,d. 4231 4
-3-
14cv l004
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?