Sharabi v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
Filing
3
ORDER (1) Granting Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Imposing Initial Partial Filing Fee, And Garnishing Remaining Balance From Prisoner Trust Account (Doc. 2 ) And (2) Directing U.S. Marshal To Effect Service Upon Defendants Pursuant To 28 U.S.C . Section 1915(d) And Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3): The Warden of FCI Otisville, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account the initial filing fee assessed in this Order, if sufficient funds are available at the time the Order is executed, and in any event shall thereafter forward the remainder of the total $350 filing fee owed by collecting monthly payments from Plaintiff's account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income and shall for ward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC Section 1915(b)(2). US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 7/24/2014. (IFP package prepared; per Order, a copy of this Order was mailed to the Warden, FCI Otisville, New York, at the address indicated on the Order.) (mdc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
MOSHE D. SHARABI,
BOP Reg. No. 08309-087,
Civil No.
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
16
17
18
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC;
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT,
Inc.,
AND
19
Defendants.
20
ORDER:
(1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, IMPOSING INITIAL
PARTIAL FILING FEE, AND
GARNISHING REMAINING
BALANCE FROM PRISONER
TRUST ACCOUNT
[ECF Doc. No. 2]
14
15
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
21
(2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL
TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON
DEFENDANTS PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND
FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3)
22
23
Moshe D. Sharabi (“Plaintiff”), a federal inmate currently incarcerated at the
24
Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Otisville, New York, and proceeding pro se,
25
has filed a civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the Fair Credit Reporting Act
26
(“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq., and the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
27
(“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1962 et seq. See Compl. at 1.
28
///
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
1
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
1
Plaintiff has not prepaid the filing fees required to commence a civil action
2
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma
3
Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF Doc. No. 2).
4
I.
MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
5
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the
6
United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee.1 See
7
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the
8
entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See
9
Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the plaintiff is a
10
prisoner, and he is granted leave to proceed IFP, he remains obligated to pay the entire
11
fee in installments and regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28
12
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002).
13
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act
14
(“PLRA”), prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a “certified copy of the
15
trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-
16
month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.”
17
§ 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified
18
trust account statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average
19
monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly
20
balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner
21
has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution
22
having custody of the prisoner then collects subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of
23
the preceding month’s income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account exceeds
24
$10, and forwards those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28
25
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
28 U.S.C.
26
1
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May 1,
2013, must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), (b); Judicial
Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule (eff. May 1, 2013). However,
28 the additional $50 administrative fee is waived if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP.
Id.
27
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
2
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
1
The Court finds that Plaintiff has submitted a certified copy of his trust account
2
statement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Andrews, 398
3
F.3d at 1119. Plaintiff’s statement shows an average monthly balance of $143.05,
4
average monthly deposits of $212.96, and an available balance of $415.15 at the time he
5
filed his Complaint. Based on this financial information, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s
6
Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF Doc. No. 2) and assesses an initial partial filing fee of
7
$42.59 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
8
However, the Warden of FCI Otisville, or his designee, shall collect this initial fee
9
only if sufficient funds in Plaintiff’s account are available at the time this Order is
10
executed pursuant to the directions set forth below. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4)
11
(providing that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action
12
or appealing a civil action or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no
13
assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee.”); Taylor, 281 F.3d at
14
850 (finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) acts as a “safety-valve” preventing dismissal
15
of a prisoner’s IFP case based solely on a “failure to pay . . . due to the lack of funds
16
available to him when payment is ordered.”). The remaining balance of the $350 total
17
owed in this case shall be collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to
18
the installment payment provisions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
19
II.
SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
20
A complaint filed by any person proceeding IFP is subject to an initial review and
21
sua sponte dismissal by the Court if Plaintiff’s complaint is found frivolous or malicious,
22
if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief
23
from a defendant who is immune. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254
24
F.3d 845, 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (holding that “the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
25
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners.”); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th
26
Cir. 2000) (en banc) (“[S]ection 1915(e) not only permits, but requires a district court to
27
dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim.”).
28
///
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
3
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
1
All complaints must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that
2
the pleader is entitled to relief.” FED.R.CIV.P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are
3
not required, but “[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by
4
mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)
5
(citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)). “Determining
6
whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that
7
requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id.
8
The “mere possibility of misconduct” falls short of meeting this plausibility standard.
9
Id.
10
“When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their
11
veracity, and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.”
12
Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679; see also Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)
13
(“[W]hen determining whether a complaint states a claim, a court must accept as true all
14
allegations of material fact and must construe those facts in the light most favorable to
15
the plaintiff.”); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (noting that
16
§ 1915(e)(2) “parallels the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)”). The
17
court “ha[s] an obligation where the petitioner is pro se, . . . to construe the pleadings
18
liberally and to afford the petitioner the benefit of any doubt.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d
19
338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1027 n.1 (9th Cir.
20
1985)).
21
Here, the Court finds Plaintiff’s FCRA and FDCPA claims are sufficient to survive
22
the initial screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).2 See Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1126-
23
27. Accordingly, the Court finds Plaintiff is entitled to U.S. Marshal service on his
24
behalf. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all
25
process, and perform all duties in [IFP] cases.”); FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3) (“[T]he court may
26
///
27
2
28
Plaintiff is cautioned that “the sua sponte screening and dismissal procedure is
cumulative of, and not a substitute for, any subsequent Rule 12(b)(6) motion that [a defendant]
may choose to bring.” Teahan v. Wilhelm, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1115, 1119 (S.D. Cal. 2007).
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
4
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
1
order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal . . . if the
2
plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.”).
3
III.
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
4
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1.
6
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF
Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED.
2.
7
The Warden of FCI Otisville, or his designee, shall collect from Plaintiff’s
8
prison trust account the initial filing fee assessed in this Order, if sufficient funds are
9
available at the time the Order is executed, and in any event shall thereafter forward the
10
remainder of the total $350 filing fee owed by collecting monthly payments from
11
Plaintiff’s account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s
12
income and shall forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the
13
account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). ALL PAYMENTS
14
SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED
15
TO THIS ACTION.
3.
16
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Warden,
17
FCI Otisville, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1000, Otisville, New York,
18
10963.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
20
4.
The Clerk shall issue a summons upon Defendants and forward it to
21
Plaintiff along with blank U.S. Marshal Form 285s for each Defendant. In addition, the
22
Clerk shall provide Plaintiff with copies of this Order, his Complaint, and the summons
23
for purposes of serving each Defendant. Upon receipt of this “IFP Package,” Plaintiff
24
is directed to complete the USM Form 285s as completely and accurately as possible,
25
and to return them to the United States Marshal according to the instructions provided
26
by the Clerk in the letter accompanying his IFP package. Thereafter, the U.S. Marshal
27
shall serve a copy of the Complaint and summons upon the Defendants as directed by
28
///
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
5
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
1
Plaintiff on the USM Form 285s. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United
2
States.
3
5.
Plaintiff shall serve upon Defendants or, if appearance has been entered by
4
counsel, upon Defendants’ counsel, a copy of every further pleading or other document
5
submitted for consideration of the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper
6
to be filed with the Clerk of the Court a certificate stating the manner in which a true and
7
correct copy of any document was served on Defendants, or counsel for Defendants, and
8
the date of service. Any paper received by the Court which has not been filed with the
9
Clerk or which fails to include a Certificate of Service will be disregarded.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
DATED: July 24, 2014
13
HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I:\Chambers Curiel\Civil - Odd\14cv1145-grt IFP&serve.wpd
6
14cv1145 GPC (RBB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?