Osman v. Johnson et al
Filing
5
ORDER STAYING ACTION AND REMANDING TO THE U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES FOR ADJUDICATION OF PLAINTIFFS NATURALIZATION APPLICATION. Should Plaintiffs application not be acted upon withinthe 30-day period, Plaintiff may, ex parte, petition the court to lift the stay andproceed on the present complaint. In such case, Plaintiff may, if she so desires, filean amended complaint or petition.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/18/2014. (cc INS and Customs)(av1)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
LUL MOHAMED OSMAN,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
JEH JOHNSON, Secretary
Department of Homeland Security;
LORI SCIALABBA, Acting Director,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services; and SUSAN CURDA,
District Director, San Diego District,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services,
ORDER STAYING ACTION AND
REMANDING TO THE U.S.
CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
SERVICES FOR ADJUDICATION OF
PLAINTIFF’S NATURALIZATION
APPLICATION
Defendants.
15
16
CASE NO. 14-cv-1295 JM (RBB)
On June 30, 2014, the parties filed a joint motion to have this matter
17 remanded to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for action to be
18 taken on Plaintiff’s pending naturalization application. In light of the parties’ joint
19 request, this court stays the present action until further order of the court and
20 remands the matter to USCIS for action to be taken on the pending application
21 within 30 days of this order. Should Plaintiff’s application not be acted upon within
22 the 30-day period, Plaintiff may, ex parte, petition the court to lift the stay and
23 proceed on the present complaint. In such case, Plaintiff may, if she so desires, file
24 an amended complaint or petition.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 DATED: July 18, 2014
27
28
Hon. Jeffrey T. Miller
United States District Judge
-1-
14-cv-1295 JM (RBB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?