Kherdeen v. U.S. Government et al

Filing 34

ORDER Denying Waiver of Chargeable Fees 19 . Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Include Waiver of Chargeable Fees under the IFP orders currently in effect is therefore Denied. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/6/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rlu)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAZEN J. KHERDEEN 12 13 vs. CASE NOS. 14cv1524 BTM (DHB); 14cv2076 BTM (DHB) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING WAIVER OF CHARGEABLE FEES U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 On July 7, 2014 this Court granted pro se Petitioner Mazen J. Kherdeen’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), which he filed together with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Case No. 14cv1524. On September 11, 2014 this Court granted a second IFP motion in a related matter, Case No. 14cv2076, and for similar reasons. On September 19, 2014 Petitioner filed this Emergency Motion to Include Waiver of Chargeable Fees under the in forma pauperis (“IFP”) orders currently in effect in both of the captioned matters. Plaintiff requests relief in the form of a waiver from paying court-imposed fees for a civil action set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1914 and Local Rule 45, including PACER1 fees that may be incurred in the 26 27 28 1 PACER is an acronym for Public Access to Court Electronics which is the system that allows users to obtain case and docket information from Federal Appellate, District and Bankruptcy courts via the Internet. This is part of this Court’s CM/ECF case management systems that maintains the electronic files in each case and offers electronic filing. 1 14cv1524 BTM(DHB); 14cv2076 BTM(DHB) 1 future. 2 Since this Court previously granted his two IFP motions, Petitioner has 3 been released from government custody on his own recognizance. Petitioner 4 claims to be homeless and without his wallet or identification (14cv2076, Docs. 5 12, 14; 14cv1524, Doc. 19). 6 The Ninth Circuit and other Courts of Appeal have traditionally held that 7 the IFP statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, provides no statutory authority for federal 8 courts to authorize waiver of witness fees or to front other costs of litigation on 9 behalf of an IFP litigant. Section 1915 only authorizes the court to permit 10 commencement of suit without prepayment of fees and costs upon a showing 11 of indigence; it does not require the court finance a civil action. See Hadsell v. 12 C.I.R.S., 107 F.3d 750, 752 (9th Cir. 1997); Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 13 (9th Cir. 1993) (28 U.S.C. § 1915 does not waive payment of fees or expenses 14 for witnesses). 15 All parties and attorneys of record receive one free electronic copy of all 16 documents filed electronically. To date, Petitioner has received a paper copy 17 of every Order issued in this matter due to his previous status of being in 18 government custody. Plaintiff also has the option of filling documents and 19 viewing the Court’s docket in the Clerk’s Office as computers are provided for 20 this purpose free of charge. If Petitioner wishes to download and print 21 documents, the fee is a very modest ten (10) cents a page. To obtain free 22 PACER access implies that Petitioner is seeking to view cases other than the 23 one currently before the Court which requires only access to the Clerk’s Office 24 and its CM/ECF system. The Court finds that a waiver of PACER fees is 25 neither appropriate nor warranted at this time. 26 // 27 // 28 // 2 14cv1524 BTM(DHB); 14cv2076 BTM(DHB) 1 2 3 4 Petitioner’s Emergency Motion to Include Waiver of Chargeable Fees under the IFP orders currently in effect is therefore DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 6, 2014 5 6 BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge United States District Court 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 14cv1524 BTM(DHB); 14cv2076 BTM(DHB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?