Martin v. Beard et al

Filing 37

ORDER (1) 24 Adopting Report and Recommendation and (2) 14 Granting Motion to Dismiss. This Court has reviewed Petitioner's objections and again reviewed the R&R and again adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in full and GRANTS Respondent's motion to dismiss. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 9/22/2015.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE MAURICE MARTIN, 11 vs. 12 13 Petitioner, JEFFREY BEARD, 14 CASE NO. 14cv1694 DMS (RBB) ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent. 15 16 On July 17, 2014, Petitioner Lawrence Maurice Martin, a state prisoner 17 proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 2254. On May 14, 2015, Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks issued a Report and 19 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant Respondent’s motion 20 to dismiss. Neither party filed objections to the R&R, and on June 30, 2015, this Cort 21 issued an order adopting the R&R and granting the motion to dismiss. On July 17, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion for a copy of the R&R. The Court 22 23 granted that motion, and also gave Petitioner an opportunity to file objections to the 24 R&R. On August 24, 2015, Petitioner filed his objections. Respondent did not file a 25 reply. 26 This Court has reviewed Petitioner’s objections and again reviewed the R&R and 27 again adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in full and GRANTS 28 / / / -1- 14cv1694 1 Respondent’s motion to dismiss. The Court finds no basis for a certificate of 2 appealability. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: September 22, 2015 5 6 7 HON. DANA M. SABRAW United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 14cv1694

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?