Hooks v. Gomez et al
Filing
3
ORDER Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 2 . Plaintiff is Granted an additional forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order to either: (1) pay the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. If Plaintiff neither pays the $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to Proceed IFP, this civil action will remained dismissed without prejudice and without further action by the Court. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/20/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service-Maiiled blank Motion for IFP)(vam)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
VERNON D. HOOKS,
CDCR #T-08976,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
Civil No.
J. GOMEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
14cv1855 MMA (KSC)
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND DISMISSING CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
[Doc. No. 2]
Vernon D. Hooks (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State
19 Prison (“KVSP”) in Delano, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights
20 complaint (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [Doc. No. 1].
21
Plaintiff claims several Calipatria State Prison officials provided him
22 inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments by
23 mistakenly giving him the wrong medication while he was incarcerated there in 2010.
24 See Compl. at 7, 9. He seeks declaratory relief as well as compensatory and punitive
25 damages. Id. at 15-17.
26
Plaintiff has not prepaid the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a);
27 instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2].
-1-
14cv1855 MMA (KSC)
1
I.
2
MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
3
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of
4 the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing
5 fee of $400.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s
6 failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)
7 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th
8 Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). “Under the
9 PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], all prisoners who file IFP civil actions must
10 pay the full amount of the filing fee,” regardless of whether their case is ultimately
11 dismissed. See Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing 28
12 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2)).
13
In order to comply with the PLRA, prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP must
14 also submit a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional
15 equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing
16 of the complaint . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). From the certified trust account
17 statement, the Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly
18 deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in
19 the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no
20 assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), (4); see Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850. Thereafter, the
21 institution having custody of the prisoner collects subsequent payments, assessed at
22 20% of the preceding month’s income, in any month in which the prisoner’s account
23 exceeds $10, and forwards them to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See 28
24 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
25
26
1
In addition to the $350 statutory fee, all parties filing civil actions on or after May
27 1, 2013, must pay an additional administrative fee of $50. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)
(Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule) (eff. May 1,
28 2013). However, the additional $50 administrative fee is waived if the plaintiff is granted
leave to proceed IFP. Id.
-2-
14cv1855 MMA (KSC)
1
While Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
2 § 1915(a), he has not attached a certified copy of his prison trust account statements,
3 or KVSP’s institutional certificate of funds or its equivalent, for the 6-month period
4 immediately preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D.
5 CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Section 1915(a)(2) clearly mandates that prisoners “seeking to bring
6 a civil action . . . without prepayment of fees . . . shall submit a certified copy of the
7 trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) . . . for the 6-month period
8 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (emphasis
9 added).
10
Without Plaintiff’s trust account statement, the Court is simply unable to assess
11 the appropriate amount of the initial filing fee which is statutorily required to initiate
12 the prosecution of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
13
II.
14
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
15
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that:
16
(1)
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED and the
17 action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee
18 mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
19
(2)
Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional forty-five (45) days from the date
20 of this Order to either: (1) pay the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee,
21 or (2) file a new Motion to Proceed IFP, which includes a certified copy of his trust
22 account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint
23 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2(b).2
24
2
Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either pre-paying
25 the full $400 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP,
his Complaint will be screened prior to service upon any defendant and may be dismissed
26 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) regardless of whether
he pays or is obligated to pay filing fees. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27
27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires”
the court to sua sponte dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous,
28 malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see
also Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar
-3-
14cv1855 MMA (KSC)
1
The Clerk of the Court is further DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with the
2 Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed
3 IFP” for Plaintiff’s use if he wishes to proceed further. If Plaintiff neither pays the
4 $400 filing fee in full nor sufficiently completes and files the attached Motion to
5 Proceed IFP, together with a certified copy of his trust account statement within 45
6 days, this civil action will remained dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
7 § 1915(a) and without further action by the Court.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 DATED: August 20, 2014
10
11
Hon. Michael M. Anello
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking
25 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.”).
Because Plaintiff’s Complaint includes allegations of inadequate medical treatment, he
26 is cautioned that prison officials violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and
unusual punishments only if they are deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs.
27 Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). The indifference must be substantial;
inadequate treatment due to malpractice, or even gross negligence, does not amount to
28 a constitutional violation. Id. at 106; Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1060 (9th Cir.
2004) (“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.”).
-4-
14cv1855 MMA (KSC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?