Cejas v. Paramo et al
Filing
159
ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference: Status Conference set for 11/14/2023 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez Jr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr on 10/30/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(exs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW A. CEJAS,
Case No.: 14cv1923-JO(LR)
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC
STATUS CONFERENCE
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
On October 11, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this action, stating
19
that they “have resolved this case in its entirety” and “stipulate[d] under Federal Rule of
20
Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii) to a dismissal of th[e] action with prejudice.” (ECF No.
21
153.) On October 16, 2023, District Judge Jinsook Ohta granted the parties’ joint motion
22
to dismiss. (ECF No. 155.) On October 17, 2023, the action was transferred from the
23
calendar of Magistrate Judge William Gallo to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Lupe
24
Rodriguez, Jr. (ECF No. 156.)
25
On October 19, 2023, Plaintiff Andrew Cejas filed an “Object[ion] to Voluntary
26
Dismissal,” stating that he has not yet received a settlement check or a confirmation that
27
the funds have been deposited into his account, as well as a copy of the settlement
28
paperwork. (ECF No. 157.) In light of Plaintiff’s filing, and after consulting with the
1
14cv1923-JO(LR)
1
chambers of District Judge Jinsook Ohta, the Court SETS a telephonic Status Conference
2
for November 14, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Counsel for Defendants is to arrange and initiate
3
the conference call with Plaintiff’s correctional institution. The telephone number for
4
Judge Rodriguez’s chambers is (760) 339-4250.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 30, 2023
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
14cv1923-JO(LR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?