Kelly et al v. Breeden et al

Filing 53

ORDER Remanding Case. In Accordance with the Ninth Circuit's opinion and mandate (Doc. No. 52 USCA Mandate), plaintiffs motions to remand are granted. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/1/2015. (Certified copy of Order sent to SDCSC - Central Division). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/1/2015.(dls)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 IN RE: INCRETIN-BASED
) Lead Case No. 13md2452 AJB (MDD)
THERAPIES PRODUCTS LIABILITY )
10 LITIGATION
)
) ORDER REMANDING CASES
11
)
)
12
) Briggs, Case No. 14cv1677 AJB (MDD)
)
13
) Kelly, Case No. 14cv2066 AJB (MDD)
)
14
) Johnson, Case No. 14cv2070 AJB (MDD)
)
15
) Martinez, Case No. 14cv2071 AJB (MDD)
)
16
) Kries, Case No. 14cv2072 AJB (MDD)
)
17
)
_______________________________ )
18
)
On August 6, 2015, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion reversing this Court’s prior
19
20 order denying the plaintiffs’ motions to remand to state court. In accordance with the
21 Ninth Circuit’s opinion and mandate, plaintiffs motions to remand are GRANTED and
22 the above-referenced cases are REMANDED.
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 DATED: September 1, 2015
25
26

Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia

27

U.S. District Judge

28
1

14cv1677 AJB (MDD)