Arellano, Jr. v. San Diego, County of et al
Filing
196
ORDER 195 on Plaintiff's Motion to Know if Service to the U.S. Attorney General is Necessary. The Clerk of Court is requested to include a copy of the Summons and Complaint when mailing this Order to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/8/21. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, including Summons and Complaint)(dlg)
Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1565 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAUL ARELLANO, JR.,
Case No.: 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO KNOW IF SERVICE TO THE
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL IS
NECESSARY
SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF, et al.,
15
Defendants.
[Doc. No. 195]
16
17
Presently before the Court is a document titled “Motion to Know If Service to U.S.
18
Attorney General Is Necessary?” (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 195. On January 6,
19
2021, the Court granted plaintiff’s “Motion for Address” and provided plaintiff the mailing
20
address of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California. Doc. No. 193. In that
21
Order, the Court recited the requirements for service on the United States as set forth in
22
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Id. at 2. Plaintiff requests in the instant Motion that
23
the Court advise him whether he is required to serve his Complaint on the United States
24
Attorney General pursuant to that Rule. Doc. No. 195.
25
The Court declines to do so. Whereas plaintiff’s “Motion for Address” merely
26
requested information, the Motion now before the Court is a request for legal advice as to
27
how to comply with Rule 4. The Supreme Court holds that pro se litigants are not entitled
28
to “personal instruction” from this Court regarding such procedural matters, because a
1
3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC
Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1566 Page 2 of 3
1
requirement that District Courts give legal advice to litigants “would undermine the …
2
judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see
3
also Jacobsen v. Filler, 790 F.2d 1362, 1365-66 (9th Cir. 1986) (noting that for the court
4
to give legal advice to a pro se litigant would be contrary to the court’s role as a “referee”
5
in the adversary process). The Court will not “act as counsel or paralegal” to plaintiff in
6
this matter. Pliler, 542 U.S. at 231.
7
For these reasons, plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. The Court directs plaintiff to
8
review the text of Rule 4(i)(1), which the Court will restate here given plaintiff’s limited
9
access to the law library:
10
(i) Serving the United States and Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or
Employees.
11
12
(1) United States. To serve the United States, a party must:
13
(A)(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United
States attorney for the district where the action is brought--or to
an assistant United States attorney or clerical employee whom
the United States attorney designates in a writing filed with the
court clerk--or
14
15
16
17
(ii) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the civilprocess clerk at the United States attorney’s office;
18
19
(B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney
General of the United States at Washington, D.C.; and
20
(C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of
the United States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail
to the agency or officer.
21
22
23
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC
Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1567 Page 3 of 3
1
Plaintiff is also directed to review the District Court’s November 9, 2020 Order, and
2
the IFP packet he has been provided. The Clerk of Court is requested to include a copy of
3
the Summons and Complaint when mailing this Order to plaintiff.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 8, 2021
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?