Arellano, Jr. v. San Diego, County of et al

Filing 196

ORDER 195 on Plaintiff's Motion to Know if Service to the U.S. Attorney General is Necessary. The Clerk of Court is requested to include a copy of the Summons and Complaint when mailing this Order to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/8/21. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, including Summons and Complaint)(dlg)

Download PDF
Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1565 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No.: 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO KNOW IF SERVICE TO THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL IS NECESSARY SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 195] 16 17 Presently before the Court is a document titled “Motion to Know If Service to U.S. 18 Attorney General Is Necessary?” (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Doc. No. 195. On January 6, 19 2021, the Court granted plaintiff’s “Motion for Address” and provided plaintiff the mailing 20 address of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California. Doc. No. 193. In that 21 Order, the Court recited the requirements for service on the United States as set forth in 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Id. at 2. Plaintiff requests in the instant Motion that 23 the Court advise him whether he is required to serve his Complaint on the United States 24 Attorney General pursuant to that Rule. Doc. No. 195. 25 The Court declines to do so. Whereas plaintiff’s “Motion for Address” merely 26 requested information, the Motion now before the Court is a request for legal advice as to 27 how to comply with Rule 4. The Supreme Court holds that pro se litigants are not entitled 28 to “personal instruction” from this Court regarding such procedural matters, because a 1 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1566 Page 2 of 3 1 requirement that District Courts give legal advice to litigants “would undermine the … 2 judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see 3 also Jacobsen v. Filler, 790 F.2d 1362, 1365-66 (9th Cir. 1986) (noting that for the court 4 to give legal advice to a pro se litigant would be contrary to the court’s role as a “referee” 5 in the adversary process). The Court will not “act as counsel or paralegal” to plaintiff in 6 this matter. Pliler, 542 U.S. at 231. 7 For these reasons, plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. The Court directs plaintiff to 8 review the text of Rule 4(i)(1), which the Court will restate here given plaintiff’s limited 9 access to the law library: 10 (i) Serving the United States and Its Agencies, Corporations, Officers, or Employees. 11 12 (1) United States. To serve the United States, a party must: 13 (A)(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United States attorney for the district where the action is brought--or to an assistant United States attorney or clerical employee whom the United States attorney designates in a writing filed with the court clerk--or 14 15 16 17 (ii) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the civilprocess clerk at the United States attorney’s office; 18 19 (B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C.; and 20 (C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of the United States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the agency or officer. 21 22 23 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC Case 3:14-cv-02404-GPC-KSC Document 196 Filed 02/08/21 PageID.1567 Page 3 of 3 1 Plaintiff is also directed to review the District Court’s November 9, 2020 Order, and 2 the IFP packet he has been provided. The Clerk of Court is requested to include a copy of 3 the Summons and Complaint when mailing this Order to plaintiff. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 3:14-cv-2404-GPC-KSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?