Karczewski v. Conant Auto Retail, San Diego, Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER spreading the mandate of the Ninth Circuit. Defenant must file an answer on or before 12/29/2017. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 12/08/2017.(jpp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN KARCZEWSKI,
Case No.: 3:14-cv-02615-JAH-JLB
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER SPREADING THE
MANDATE OF THE NINTH
CIRCUIT [Doc. No. 20]
CONANT AUTO RETAIL, SAN DIEGO
INC., a California Limited Liability
Company,
15
16
Defendant.
17
18
On August 1, 2017, the Court received the United States Court of Appeals for the
19
Ninth Circuit’s mandate and memorandum vacating this Court’s order granting
20
Defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. The Ninth Circuit remanded this action for
21
further proceedings in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
22
Specifically, the Ninth Circuit held that Plaintiff has alleged facts sufficient to state a claim
23
under 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(ii).
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
25
1.
The mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit on July 10, 2017 is spread;
26
2.
The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this matter for further proceedings as
27
directed by the Ninth Circuit.
28
1
3:14-cv-02615-JAH-JLB
1
3.
Based on the Ninth Circuit’s determination that Plaintiff’s allegations are
2
sufficient to warrant an answer, Defendant must file an answer on or before December 29,
3
2017.
4
DATED:
December 8, 2017
5
6
7
_________________________________
JOHN A. HOUSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
3:14-cv-02615-JAH-JLB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?