Ewing v. Flora et al
Filing
43
ORDER Overruling 41 Plaintiff's Objection and Denying Partial Appeal. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 9/4/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTON A. EWING,
Case No.: 14cv2925 AJB (NLS)
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
ORDER OVERRULING
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION AND
DENYING PARTIAL APPEAL
v.
PHILIP A. FLORA (aka Phil Flora or
Philip Anthony Flora); EVERY DATA,
INC., an unknown corporation; EVERY
DATA, a fictitious business; DOES 1100; ABC CORPORATIONS 1-100;
LLC’S 1-100,
15
16
17
18
(Doc. No. 41)
Defendants.
19
20
21
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Anton Ewing’s (“Plaintiff”) notice of partial
22
appeal of the order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for a
23
protective order. (Doc. No. 42.) On August 26, 2015, Magistrate Judge Stormes issued an
24
order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for a protective order.
25
(Doc. No. 40.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a party may object to a
26
magistrate judge’s order at which point the “district judge in the case must consider
27
timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or
28
is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Plaintiff’s only objection is that a portion of the
1
14cv2925 AJB (NLS)
1
order lacks legal authority. However, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
2
26(c)(1), the Court has authority to enter protective orders and is afforded wide discretion
3
in doing so. This authority includes entering a protective order specifying the terms for
4
discovery and prescribing a discovery method other than the one selected by the parties.
5
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(B),(C). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED
6
and the partial appeal is DENIED.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: September 4, 2015
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
14cv2925 AJB (NLS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?