Buchanan v. Garikaparthi et al

Filing 49

Klingele Notice, ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion, and Amended Scheduling Order. Responses due by 8/4/2017, Replies due by 8/18/2017 re Motion for Summary Judgment. Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and La w due by 10/9/2017. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/30/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/6/2017 10:30 AM before Judge Roger T. Benitez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/13/2017.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 15cv59-BEN-MDD TORRY BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. DR. A. GARIKAPARTHI, DR. S. ROBERTS, Defendants. KLINGELE NOTICE, ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION, and AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER [ECF No. 48] 19 20 21 22 23 On June 27, 2017, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment 24 (“MSJ”), with a hearing date of August 28, 2017. (ECF No. 48). The Court 25 hereby VACATES the August 28, 2017, hearing, enters the following 26 Briefing Schedule on the summary judgment motion, and enters the following 27 Amended Scheduling Order concerning upcoming pretrial dates. 1 15cv59-BEN-MDD MSJ BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file briefs and supporting papers and evidence as follows: 1. Plaintiff may file and serve his opposition, including any evidence, 5 to the matters raised by Defendants’ summary judgment motion (ECF No. 6 48) by August 4, 2017. If you do not wish to oppose Defendants’ motion, you 7 should file and serve a “Notice of Non-Opposition” by that same date to let 8 the Court know that Defendants’ motion is unopposed. 9 10 2. If you do file and serve an opposition, Defendants must file and serve their reply to your opposition by August 18, 2017. 11 12 13 KLINGELE NOTICE The following notice is required pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 14 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999) and Klingele 15 v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), for all parties proceeding pro se: 16 Defendants in this case have moved the Court to enter judgment for the 17 reasons raised in their summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 48). The Court 18 will consider the motion after giving you notice and opportunity to be heard. 19 A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure will, if granted, end your case. 21 Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure tells you what you must 22 do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary 23 judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – 24 that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result 25 of your case – and where the party who asked for summary judgment is 26 entitled to judgment as a matter of law. When a party you are suing seeks 27 summary judgment and their position is properly supported by declarations 2 15cv59-BEN-MDD 1 (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply reply by restating what your 2 complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, 3 depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents that 4 contradict the facts shown in the Defendants’ declarations and documents 5 and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact requiring trial. If you 6 do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if 7 appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, 8 your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. 9 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 10 11 The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 12 1. For bench trials before the Honorable Roger T. Benitez, the 13 parties shall file their Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law and take 14 any other action required by Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(2) by October 9, 2017. 15 In jury trial cases before the Honorable Roger T. Benitez, neither party, 16 unless otherwise ordered by the Court, is required to file Memoranda of 17 Contentions of Fact and Law pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(2). 18 2. The parties shall comply with the pre-trial disclosure 19 requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) by October 9, 2017. 20 Failure to comply with these disclosure requirements could result in evidence 21 preclusion or other sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. 22 3. The parties shall meet and take the action required by Civil Local 23 Rule 16.1(f)(4) by October 16, 2017. At this meeting, the parties shall 24 discuss and attempt to enter into stipulations and agreements resulting in 25 simplification of the triable issues. The parties shall exchange copies and/or 26 display all exhibits other than those to be used for impeachment. The 27 exhibits shall be prepared in accordance with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(4)(c). 3 15cv59-BEN-MDD 1 The parties shall note any objections they have to any other parties’ Pretrial 2 Disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall 3 cooperate in the preparation of the proposed pretrial conference order. 4 4. Counsel for Defendants will be responsible for preparing the 5 pretrial order and arranging the meetings of the parties pursuant to Civil 6 Local Rule 16.1(f). By October 23, 2017, Defendants’ counsel must provide 7 Plaintiff with the proposed pretrial order for review and approval. Plaintiff 8 must communicate promptly with Defendants’ attorney concerning any 9 objections to form or content of the pretrial order, and both parties shall 10 11 attempt promptly to resolve their differences, if any, concerning the order. 5. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order, including 12 objections to any other parties’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) 13 Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and lodged with the assigned 14 district judge by October 30, 2017, and shall be in the form prescribed in 15 and comply with Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(6). 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 6. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable Roger T. Benitez on November 6, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. 7. A post trial settlement conference before a magistrate judge may be held within 30 days of verdict in the case. 8. No other dates in prior Scheduling Orders in this case are amended; all deadlines that have already expired remain expired. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2017 24 25 26 27 4 15cv59-BEN-MDD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?