Clay et al v. Cytosport, Inc.

Filing 195

ORDER Granting Defendant's 186 Ex Parte Application to File Documents Under Seal. It is ordered that (1) Exhibit F to the Declaration of Matthew I. Kaplan (redacted version filed as doc. 170-4 at 14-52); (2) Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D. (Ugone Declaration) (redacted version filed as doc. 170-22); and (3) Exhibits 5-9 and 13-16 to the Ugone Declaration (redacted versions filed as doc. 170-23 at 81-95 and 170-24 at 5-40) be filed under seal. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 5/23/2017. (dxj)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAYLA CLAY et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 Case 15-CV-0165 -L AGS ORDER GRANTINTG DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL v. 14 CYTOSPORT, INC., Defendant. 15 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Ex Parte Application to File Portions of 18 Certain Declarations and Exhibits in Support of Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s 19 Motion for Class Certification and Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions 20 Expressed by Dr. Elizabeth Howlett Under Seal (doc. no. 186, "Ex Parte Application"). 21 Defendant's Ex Parte Application meets the compelling reasons standard for sealing 22 documents filed in relation to dispositive motions. See Kamakana v. City and County of 23 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Ex Parte 24 Application is GRANTED. The Clerk shall file the following documents under seal: 25 (1) Exhibit F to the Declaration of Matthew I. Kaplan (redacted version filed as 26 doc. 170-4 at 14-52); 27 (2) Declaration of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D. (“Ugone Declaration”) (redacted version 28 filed as doc. 170-22); and 1 1 2 3 4 (3) Exhibits 5-9 and 13-16 to the Ugone Declaration (redacted versions filed as doc. 170-23 at 81-95 and 170-24 at 5-40). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?