Ocampo v. United States of America et al

Filing 257

ORDER denying #254 Ex Parte Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/05/2020. (djk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 KAREN OCAMPO, as the personal representative of SALOMON RODRIGUEZ, 13 Case No.: 15-CV-180-JAH-WVG ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION TO APPROVE DISTRIBUTION OF MINOR’S SETTLEMENT FUNDS Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 On June 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Ex Parte Motion to Approve Distribution of 21 Minor’s Settlement Funds (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 254.) On June 5, 2020 Defendant 22 National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (“NASSCO”) filed its Opposition to Plaintiff’s 23 Motion. (Doc. No. 256.) Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ submissions, the 24 Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion without prejudice. The Court finds salient that 25 neither party has provided notice of settlement to the presiding probate court judge. Such 26 lack of notice is at odds with Plaintiff’s counsel’s representations during the September 18, 27 2019 confidential settlement proceedings before Judge Houston that the probate court 28 judge ordered counsel to provide such notice before any distribution was to occur. 1 15-CV-180-JAH-WVG 1 Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel to jointly notify the probate court judge 2 and guardian ad litem of the Parties’ notice and proposed distribution of the minor’s 3 settlement funds no later than Friday, June 12, 2020. Within two (2) business days of the 4 probate court judge’s order approving the Parties’ settlement and proposed distribution, the 5 Parties shall jointly contact this Court’s Chambers to coordinate further proceedings in this 6 matter. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 5, 2020 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 15-CV-180-JAH-WVG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?