Ocampo v. United States of America et al
Filing
257
ORDER denying #254 Ex Parte Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 6/05/2020. (djk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
KAREN OCAMPO, as the personal
representative of SALOMON
RODRIGUEZ,
13
Case No.: 15-CV-180-JAH-WVG
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE MOTION TO APPROVE
DISTRIBUTION OF MINOR’S
SETTLEMENT FUNDS
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and
NATIONAL STEEL AND
SHIPBUILDING COMPANY,
16
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
On June 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Ex Parte Motion to Approve Distribution of
21
Minor’s Settlement Funds (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 254.) On June 5, 2020 Defendant
22
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (“NASSCO”) filed its Opposition to Plaintiff’s
23
Motion. (Doc. No. 256.) Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ submissions, the
24
Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion without prejudice. The Court finds salient that
25
neither party has provided notice of settlement to the presiding probate court judge. Such
26
lack of notice is at odds with Plaintiff’s counsel’s representations during the September 18,
27
2019 confidential settlement proceedings before Judge Houston that the probate court
28
judge ordered counsel to provide such notice before any distribution was to occur.
1
15-CV-180-JAH-WVG
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel to jointly notify the probate court judge
2
and guardian ad litem of the Parties’ notice and proposed distribution of the minor’s
3
settlement funds no later than Friday, June 12, 2020. Within two (2) business days of the
4
probate court judge’s order approving the Parties’ settlement and proposed distribution, the
5
Parties shall jointly contact this Court’s Chambers to coordinate further proceedings in this
6
matter.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 5, 2020
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
15-CV-180-JAH-WVG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?