Securities and Exchange Commission v. Total Wealth Management, Inc. et al
Filing
56
ORDER Sanctioning Attorney Vincent J. Brown; and Scheduling Telephonic Status Conference: Attorney Vincent J. Brown shall personally pay a sanction of $500.00 for his failures to appear in this action. The sanction shall be paid from Mr. Brown 's personal funds no later than December 7, 2015. A telephonic Status Conference, with all parties, shall be held on November 23, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Bartick. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Defendant Jacob Keith Cooper. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 11/6/15.Order mailed to Keith Cooper (dlg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Case No.: 15cv226-BAS (DHB)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
ORDER SANCTIONING
ATTORNEY VINCENT J. BROWN;
AND SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC
STATUS CONFERENCE
13
14
15
16
v.
TOTAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
On October 13, 2015, the Court held an Order to Show Cause Hearing regarding
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
whether Attorney Vincent J. Brown, counsel for Defendant Jacob Keith Cooper, should be
sanctioned for his failures to appear at the August 28, 2015 Case Management Conference,
the September 8, 2015 Case Management Conference, the September 10, 2015 Show Cause
Hearing, and the October 13, 2015 Show Cause Hearing. For the reasons set forth below,
the Court finds Mr. Brown should be personally sanctioned for his repeated failures to
respond to Court orders and appear at scheduled hearings.
///
///
///
1
15cv226-BAS (DHB)
1
I.
2
On July 23, 2015, the Court held a telephonic Status Conference in this case. Mr.
3
Brown appeared on behalf of Defendant Cooper. (ECF No. 41.) On August 28, 2015, the
4
Court held a telephonic Case Management Conference. However, Mr. Brown did not
5
appear for the conference. (ECF No. 45.) The Court attempted to reach Mr. Brown at the
6
number listed on the docket for his office, but was unsuccessful. Counsel for Plaintiff
7
speculated that Mr. Brown may have had a medical issue that caused his failure to appear.
8
Therefore, the Court continued the Case Management Conference to September 8, 2015,
9
and issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) regarding Mr. Brown’s non-appearance. The
10
Court also directed Mr. Brown to file a written response to the OSC by September 4, 2015.
11
(ECF Nos. 46, 47.)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
12
On September 8, 2015, Mr. Brown failed to appear for the rescheduled telephonic
13
Case Management Conference. (ECF No. 48.) The Court again attempted to reach Mr.
14
Brown by telephone, to no avail. On September 10, 2015, the Court held a Show Cause
15
Hearing, and Mr. Brown did not appear. (ECF No. 50.) Mr. Brown also did not respond
16
in writing to the OSC as ordered by the Court.
17
On October 5, 2015, the Court set a further Show Cause Hearing for October 13,
18
2015. (ECF No. 52.) The Court invited Mr. Brown to respond to the OSC in writing, if he
19
so desired. Mr. Brown did not respond in writing, and did not appear at the hearing on
20
October 13, 2015. (ECF No. 55.)
21
The Court notes that it has attempted to reach Mr. Brown by telephone on several
22
occasions, and has been unsuccessful. The Court has not been able to leave Mr. Brown a
23
voicemail message, as his office number will not accept messages.
24
II.
25
If a party’s attorney fails to appear at a scheduling or other pretrial conference, the
26
Court has discretion to impose sanctions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); CivLR83.1; Ayers v. City
27
of Richmond, 895 F.2d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir. 1990). Monetary sanctions may be personally
28
imposed on counsel for such failures. Miranda v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.,
DISCUSSION
2
15cv226-BAS (DHB)
1
710 F.2d 516, 521 (9th Cir. 1983).
2
To date, Mr. Brown has repeatedly disregarded this Court’s orders, failed to appear
3
at scheduled hearings, and has not proffered any excuse for his lack of participation in this
4
case. Indeed, Mr. Brown has failed to respond in any way to the Orders to Show Cause
5
issued on August 28, 2015 and October 5, 2015. Because concerns were initially expressed
6
that a medical condition may have been the cause for Mr. Brown’s absences, the Court set
7
this matter for a second Show Cause Hearing, and has waited patiently for any response
8
from Mr. Brown. However, at this point, it appears there is no justification for Mr. Brown’s
9
failures to appear. Therefore, the Court finds monetary sanctions are warranted. The Court
10
determines that an appropriate sanction is a fine in the amount of $500.00, payable to the
11
Court for deposit in the nonappropriated fund of the Court. The fine shall be paid from
12
Mr. Brown’s personal funds.
13
III.
14
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1.
CONCLUSION
Attorney Vincent J. Brown shall personally pay a sanction of $500.00 for his
16
failures to appear in this action. The sanction shall be paid from Mr. Brown’s personal
17
funds no later than December 7, 2015 through a check payable to the “Clerk, U.S. District
18
Court.” The case number of this action and the word “Sanction” shall be noted on the
19
check.
20
2.
A telephonic Status Conference, with all parties, shall be held on November
21
23, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Bartick. The Court orders Defendant Jacob Keith
22
Cooper to appear by telephone at the conference. Defendant Cooper is advised that if he
23
believes Mr. Brown will be unavailable to participate in the conference, he has the option
24
to have another attorney appear at the status conference on his behalf. The parties shall
25
use the Court’s conferencing system:
26
Conference number:
(888) 684-8852
27
Access code:
2236596
28
Participant security code:
0226
3
15cv226-BAS (DHB)
1
2
3
4
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Defendant Jacob
Keith Cooper at the following address:
Jacob Keith Cooper
370 E. Silver Hawk Ct.
Washington UT, 84780
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 6, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
15cv226-BAS (DHB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?