Securities and Exchange Commission v. Total Wealth Management, Inc. et al
Filing
75
ORDER granting Receiver's 51 First Interim Motion for Payment of Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses. Court grants on an interim basis, the applications for fees and reimbursement of expenses for the period of 2/4/2015 through 6/30/2015. Court approves Receiver's fees in the amount of $195,832.90. Court authorizes the Receiver to pay herself 90% of the approved fees, or $176,249.61 from the assets of the Receivership Entities on an interim basis. Court approves Allen M atkins' fees in the amount of $252,037.35, and authorizes and directs the Receiver to pay Allen Matkins 80% of the approved fees, or $201,629.88 from the assets of the Receivership Entities on an interim basis. Court approves Allen Matkins' request for reimibursement of costs totaling $17,081.93, and authorizes and directs the Receiver to reimiburse Allen Matkins for costs in full. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/24/2016. (jah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 15-cv-226-BAS-DHB
ORDER GRANTING FIRST
INTERIM APPLICATIONS FOR
PAYMENT OF FEES AND
REIMBURSEMENT OF
EXPENSES
Plaintiff,
v.
TOTAL WEALTH
MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Pending before the Court in this Securities and Exchange Commission
20
(“SEC”) enforcement action are the first interim applications for fees and expenses
21
of (1) Kristen A. Janulewicz (the “Receiver”), the Court-appointed permanent
22
receiver for Defendant Total Wealth Management Inc. and its subsidiaries and
23
affiliates (the “Receivership Entities”) and (2) the Receiver’s counsel, Allen Matkins
24
Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (“Allen Matkins”). (ECF No. 51.) The
25
applications cover the period February 4, 2015 through June 30, 2015 (the
26
“Application Period”) and seek interim approval of $195,832.90 in fees incurred by
27
the Receiver and $252,037.35 and $17,081.93 in fees and costs respectively incurred
28
by Allen Matkins. Id. The SEC has reviewed the fee applications and supports the
–1–
15cv226
1
request for interim payment in the amounts requested. (ECF No. 54.)
2
I.
DISCUSSION
3
A. Legal Standard
4
“A receiver appointed by a court who reasonably and diligently discharges his
5
duties is entitled to be fairly compensated for services rendered and expenses
6
incurred.” SEC v. Byers, 590 F.Supp.2d 637, 644 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). This entitlement
7
to reasonable compensation extends to the professionals employed by the receiver.
8
See Drilling & Exploration Corp. v. Webster, 69 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir. 1934). The
9
amount of compensation to be awarded is firmly within the discretion of the district
10
court, and generally is a charge upon the property or funds in receivership. Gaskill v.
11
Gordon, 27 F.3d 248, 251, 253 (7th Cir. 1994). In determining the reasonableness of
12
fees and costs requested, the court considers the time records presented, the quality
13
of the work performed, the complexity of the problems faced, and the benefits to the
14
receivership estate. SEC v. Fifth Ave. Coach Lines, Inc., 364 F.Supp. 1220, 1222
15
(S.D.N.Y. 1973). The receiver bears the burden to demonstrate to the court
16
entitlement to payment of fees and costs in the amount requested. See 65 Am. Jur.
17
2d, Receivers § 228 (2d ed. Feb. 2016 update). Finally, in a securities receivership,
18
“[o]pposition or acquiescence by the SEC to the fee application will be given great
19
weight.” Fifth Ave. Coach Lines, 364 F.Supp. at 1222.
20
B. Receiver’s Request for Fees
21
The Receiver’s request for $195,832.90 in fees incurred during the Application
22
Period includes the fees of associated professionals who have worked with her on
23
behalf of the Receivership Entities. During the Application Period, the Receiver and
24
her staff worked a total of 1,014.6 hours on behalf of the Receivership Entities,
25
including tasks such as document review, financial analysis and forensic accounting,
26
communication and interviews with investors and witnesses, the takeover of property
27
on behalf of the receivership entities, and meeting and coordinating actions with the
28
SEC. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 3.) The average hourly rate ranged from $65 for
–2–
15cv226
1
administrative tasks to $321 for financial analysis, with a weighted average rate of
2
$193 per hour. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 7.) The Receiver herself worked at an hourly
3
rate of $270. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 5.) All travel time was charged at half the hourly
4
rate or written off entirely. Id.
5
The Court finds the Receiver’s request for $195,832.90 in fees incurred during
6
the Application Period to be reasonable. All fees are meticulously documented and
7
presented in such a way that the Court could clearly evaluate the tasks performed,
8
hours expended, the hourly rate for each task, and the total fees incurred in each
9
category. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 5–7.) The Receiver’s hourly rate of $270, and the
10
weighted average rate of $193 per hour, are eminently reasonable. The Receiver has
11
made substantial progress in identifying and recovering receivership assets, including
12
the recovery of approximately $3.2 million. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 3, 8:1–24.) In light
13
of the complexity of the matter and the need for immediate action to prevent the
14
dissipation of assets, the number of hours expended during the Application Period is
15
reasonable. In addition, the SEC’s stated support for the Receiver’s request weighs
16
in favor of finding the fee application reasonable. Accordingly, the Court approves,
17
on an interim basis, the Receiver’s request for $195,832.90 in fees incurred during
18
the Application Period, and authorizes the payment, on an interim basis, of 90% of
19
the fees incurred, in the amount of $176,249.61.
20
C. Allen Matkins’ Request for Fees and Expenses
21
During the Application Period, Allen Matkins spent a total of 566.5 hours
22
working on behalf of the Receivership Entities, at a weighted average rate of $444.90
23
per hour, for fees totaling $252,037.35. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 9, 1:10–13.) In addition,
24
Allen Matkins incurred $17,081.93 in expenses. (Id.) The firm performed a wide
25
range of tasks assisting the Receiver during the Application Period, including drafting
26
and submitting briefing papers, preparing the Receiver’s Initial Report and
27
Recommendations and Petition for Further Instructions, investigating the
28
complicated web of companies in which Defendants invested through participation
–3–
15cv226
1
in various funds, and reviewing the extent of the Receivership Entities’ interest in
2
Metropolitan Coffee and Concession Company, LLC (“Metro Coffee”) and
3
negotiating the terms of Metro Coffee’s sale and the turnover of $260,000 in surplus
4
proceeds to the Receiver. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 9.) These efforts resulted in tangible
5
benefits to Defendants’ clients, including recovery of approximately $3.2 million in
6
receivership assets as described above.
7
The Court finds Allen Matkins’ request for fees and costs to be reasonable.
8
Allen Matkins is a well-known firm with extensive experience in federal
9
receiverships, and the firm’s billing rates are comparable to the usual fees for
10
similarly complex services in the community. The detailed time records submitted
11
indicate that the firm staffed the tasks performed appropriately and efficiently based
12
on the expertise required. (ECF No. 51, Attach. 9–13.) The amount requested in fees
13
also reflects Allen Matkins’ agreement to discount its ordinary billing rates on this
14
matter by 10%, and to not bill travel time in connection with this matter. (ECF No.
15
21, 9:9–17.) As explained above, the firm’s efforts have substantially benefited the
16
Receivership Entities in the form of recovered assets. And finally, as in the case of
17
the Receiver’s fee application, the Court ascribes great weight to the SEC’s support
18
of Allen Matkins’ request for fees and reimbursement of expenses as reasonable.
19
(ECF No. 54.) Accordingly, the Court approves, on an interim basis, Allen Matkins’
20
request for $252,037.35 in fees incurred during the Application Period, and
21
authorizes the payment, on an interim basis, of 80% of the fees incurred, in the
22
amount of $201,629.88. In addition, the firm’s request for reimbursement of expenses
23
in the amount of $17,081.93 is approved as reasonable.
24
II.
25
For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS, on an interim basis, the
26
applications for fees and reimbursement of expenses for the period February 4, 2015
27
through June 30, 2015 as follows:
28
CONCLUSION & ORDER
1. The Court APPROVES the Receiver’s fees, in the amount of $195,832.90;
–4–
15cv226
1
2. The Court AUTHORIZES the Receiver to pay herself 90% of approved
2
fees, or $176,249.61, from the assets of the Receivership Entities, on an
3
interim basis;
4
3. The Court APPROVES Allen Matkins’ fees, in the amount of $252,037.35;
5
4. The Court AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS the Receiver to pay Allen
6
Matkins 80% of approved fees, or $201,629.88, from the assets of the
7
Receivership Entities, on an interim basis;
8
5. The Court APPROVES Allen Matkins’ request for reimbursement of costs,
9
totaling $17,081.93, and AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS the Receiver to
10
reimburse Allen Matkins for such costs in full.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
DATED: February 24, 2016
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–5–
15cv226
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?