Kohl v. The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York et al
Filing
5
ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with her claims, she must refile her lawsuit along with the required filing fees. This Case is closed. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/17/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
MELODY KOHL,
Case No.: 15-CV-849-CAB-DHB
Plaintiff,
5
vs.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New
York et al.
Defendants.
[Doc. No. 2]
6
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff, a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and motion for a
11
temporary restraining order asserting various claims in an effort to prevent a
12
residential foreclosure. Plaintiff also submitted a Motion and Declaration Under
13
Penalty of Perjury in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”)
14
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to
15
proceed IFP is denied.
16
I.
17
All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of
18
the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing
19
fee of $350 plus a $50 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5.
20
An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
1
15-CV-849-CAB-DHB
1
the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See
2
Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).
3
Here, Plaintiff’s declaration fails to show that she is unable to pay the fees or
4
post securities required to maintain this action. Plaintiff states that she is a realtor
5
with an income of $1,900 per month in addition to commissions from home sales,
6
which in the past year totaled $9,000. In other words, Plaintiff’s monthly income
7
plus commissions totaled $31,800 for the past year.
8
ownership of a 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe, has only one dependent, and lists monthly
9
expenses totaling only $1,705 (which amount includes $80 for cable, $375 for gas,
10
and $600 for water and electric utilities, as well as $565 for “MLS” and “Sandicor”
11
fees that appear to be business expenses).
Plaintiff has complete
12
Although the federal poverty guidelines are not the sole basis for
13
determining in forma pauperis status, the 2015 federal poverty guidelines issued
14
by the United States Department of Health & Human Services set the poverty
15
threshold for a two person household’s annual income at $15,930 in the 48
16
contiguous states and the District of Columbia. See Annual Update of the HHS
17
Poverty Guidelines, 80 Fed. Reg. 3236-37 (Jan. 22, 2015). The Court further notes
18
that the Legal Services Corporation provides civil legal aid for low-income
19
Americans, and its maximum income level for a two person household eligible for
20
legal assistance is $19,913 (125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines). See Income
2
15-CV-849-CAB-DHB
1
Level for Individuals Eligible for Assistance, 80 Fed. Reg. 5485-86 (Feb. 2, 2015).
2
Plaintiff’s annual income far exceeds these poverty guidelines. Moreover, in light
3
the fact that Plaintiff’s monthly income far exceeds her monthly living expenses,
4
the Court finds that payment of the filing fee in this case would not prevent
5
Plaintiff from being “able to provide [her]self and dependents with the necessities
6
of life.” See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948).
7
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28
8
U.S.C. § 1915(a).
9
II.
Conclusion and Order
10
In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s
11
Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. [Doc. No. 2.] If Plaintiff wishes to proceed
12
with her claims, she must refile her lawsuit along with the required filing fees.
13
This Case is CLOSED.
14
15
It is SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 17, 2015
16
17
18
19
20
3
15-CV-849-CAB-DHB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?