Kohl v. The Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York et al

Filing 5

ORDER Denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with her claims, she must refile her lawsuit along with the required filing fees. This Case is closed. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 4/17/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 MELODY KOHL, Case No.: 15-CV-849-CAB-DHB Plaintiff, 5 vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York et al. Defendants. [Doc. No. 2] 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, a nonprisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and motion for a 11 temporary restraining order asserting various claims in an effort to prevent a 12 residential foreclosure. Plaintiff also submitted a Motion and Declaration Under 13 Penalty of Perjury in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) 14 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to 15 proceed IFP is denied. 16 I. 17 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of 18 the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing 19 fee of $350 plus a $50 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5. 20 An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 1 15-CV-849-CAB-DHB 1 the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See 2 Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). 3 Here, Plaintiff’s declaration fails to show that she is unable to pay the fees or 4 post securities required to maintain this action. Plaintiff states that she is a realtor 5 with an income of $1,900 per month in addition to commissions from home sales, 6 which in the past year totaled $9,000. In other words, Plaintiff’s monthly income 7 plus commissions totaled $31,800 for the past year. 8 ownership of a 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe, has only one dependent, and lists monthly 9 expenses totaling only $1,705 (which amount includes $80 for cable, $375 for gas, 10 and $600 for water and electric utilities, as well as $565 for “MLS” and “Sandicor” 11 fees that appear to be business expenses). Plaintiff has complete 12 Although the federal poverty guidelines are not the sole basis for 13 determining in forma pauperis status, the 2015 federal poverty guidelines issued 14 by the United States Department of Health & Human Services set the poverty 15 threshold for a two person household’s annual income at $15,930 in the 48 16 contiguous states and the District of Columbia. See Annual Update of the HHS 17 Poverty Guidelines, 80 Fed. Reg. 3236-37 (Jan. 22, 2015). The Court further notes 18 that the Legal Services Corporation provides civil legal aid for low-income 19 Americans, and its maximum income level for a two person household eligible for 20 legal assistance is $19,913 (125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines). See Income 2 15-CV-849-CAB-DHB 1 Level for Individuals Eligible for Assistance, 80 Fed. Reg. 5485-86 (Feb. 2, 2015). 2 Plaintiff’s annual income far exceeds these poverty guidelines. Moreover, in light 3 the fact that Plaintiff’s monthly income far exceeds her monthly living expenses, 4 the Court finds that payment of the filing fee in this case would not prevent 5 Plaintiff from being “able to provide [her]self and dependents with the necessities 6 of life.” See Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 7 Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 8 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 9 II. Conclusion and Order 10 In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 11 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. [Doc. No. 2.] If Plaintiff wishes to proceed 12 with her claims, she must refile her lawsuit along with the required filing fees. 13 This Case is CLOSED. 14 15 It is SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2015 16 17 18 19 20 3 15-CV-849-CAB-DHB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?