Saterbak v. National Default Servicing Corporation et al

Filing 65

CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and National Default Servicing Corporation are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant J P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Securitized Asset Management II, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion for Order is denied as moot. The Motion for Entry ofDefault is denied. (mdc)

United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Laura D. Saterbak,
Laura D. Saterbak
Plaintiff,
V.

Civil Action No.

15cv956-WQH-BGS

Plaintiff,

V.
National Default Servicing Corporation; Select
Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; JP Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A.; Securitized Asset Management II, Inc.;
DOES 1-10,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Defendant.
Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and National Default Servicing
Corporation are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A. are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Securitized Asset Management
II, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion for Order is denied as moot. The Motion for Entry of
Default is denied.

Date:

1/20/17

CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ M. Cruz
M. Cruz, Deputy