Trujillo et al v. Ametek, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER Denying 81 Request for Status Conference; and Granting Request for Briefing Schedule for Objections to Plaintiff's Response to Court's Lone Pine Order 77 . Defendants shall file any objections by January 2, 2016. Plaintiff shall file any reply by January 23, 2016. A response to Plaintiffs reply may be filed on or before January 30, 2016. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 12/2/16. (dlg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIELLE TRUJILLO, as Guardian 11 Ad Litem for KADEN PORTER, a minor, on behalf of himself and others 12 similarly situated; LACEY 13 MORALES, as Guardian Ad Litem for ISABEL MORALES., a minor, on behalf of herself and others similarly 15 situated; BEVERLY HOY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly 16 situated; 14 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. 19 AMETEK, INC., a Delaware corporation; SENIOR OPERATIONS, 21 LLC, a limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 22 23 fff Defendants. ) ) CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-01394-GPC-BGS ) ) ORDER: ) ) (1) DENYING REQUEST FOR ) STATUS CONFERENCE ) [Dkt. No. 81] ) ) ) (2) GRANTING REQUEST FOR ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ) OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S ) RESPONSE TO COURT’S LONE ) PINE ORDER ) [Dkt. No. 77] ) ) ) ) 24 25 26 27 28 3:15-cv-01394-GPC-BGS 1 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion Regarding Defendants’ Request for 2 a Status Conference or Briefing Schedule Regarding a Challenge to Plaintiff’s Response 3 to the Lone Pine Case Management Order No. 1 (“Joint Motion”). Dkt. No. 81. In the 4 Joint Motion, Defendants ask the Court for (1) “a status conference in order to address 5 the procedure for raising objections to the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s submissions in 6 response to the Lone Pine CMO” or (2) in the alternative, “a briefing and hearing 7 schedule for Defendants’ motion challenging the sufficiency of said submission.” Id. at 8 2. Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ request, arguing that they lack authority for their 9 request to file a response and that additional briefing is “unprecedented and unfair to 10 Plaintiffs at this early stage of the litigation.” Dkt. No. 81 at 7. 11 The Court finds that setting a briefing schedule for Defendants’ objections to 12 Plaintiff’s Lone Pine submission is proper. In Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc., the Fifth 13 Circuit upheld a magistrate judge’s decision to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims for failure to 14 comply with a Lone Pine order. 200 F.3d 335, 340-41 (5th Cir. 2000). And before the 15 magistrate judge had dismissed the plaintiff’s claims, the court had issued an order 16 directing the defendant to file a motion to dismiss for failure to comply with the Court’s 17 Lone Pine order. Order at 1-2, 1998 WL 35283825, No. 96-cv-0543 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 18 1998), ECF No. 67 at 1 (“the deadline for filing a motion to dismiss for failure to 19 comply with the scheduling order is . . . .”). 20 Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ request for a status conference and 21 GRANTS Defendants’ request to set a briefing schedule for objections to Plaintiff’s 22 Lone Pine submission. Defendants may file objections challenging Plaintiff’s prima 23 facie evidence as insufficient pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Order No.1, 24 Dkt. No. 71 at 7. Such objections, however, should only consist of argument 25 concerning the deficiencies in Plaintiff’s submission and not evidence. In other words, 26 the Court declines Defendants’ invitation, see Dkt. No. 81 at 6, to convert Plaintiff’s 27 Lone Pine response and Defendants’ subsequent objections into a motion for summary 28 judgment. The Court’s inquiry will focus on the adequacy of Plaintiff’s showing only. -13:15-cv-01394-GPC-BGS CONCLUSION 1 2 The Court hereby enters the following briefing schedule: Defendants shall file 3 any objections to Plaintiff’s Lone Pine submission (Dkt. No. 77) by January 2, 2016. 4 Plaintiff shall file any reply by January 23, 2016. A response to Plaintiff’s reply may 5 be filed on or before January 30, 2016. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: December 2, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -23:15-cv-01394-GPC-BGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?