Foley v. Oceanside Police Department et al

Filing 114

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff's objections; (3) And Grants the motionto dismiss With Prejudice. Judgment shall be entered for defendants. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)

Download PDF
United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Gregory D. Foley Civil Action No. 15-cv-01627-CAB-AGS Plaintiff, V. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE See Attachment Defendant. Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff’s objections; (3) And Grants the motion to dismiss With Prejudice. Judgment shall be entered for defendants. It Is So Ordered. Date: 3/19/18 CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ J. Gutierrez J. Gutierrez, Deputy United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (ATTACHMENT) Civil Action No. 15-cv-1627-CAB-AGS Defendants DOES 1-12; Corey Kaldenbach; Mark Lavake; Larry Weber; Leonard John Cosby; Jonathan Kislingbury; Jennifer Luecht; Steve Stracke; Ronald Nevares; Mark Wheeler; Samuel Hay, Officer; Anis Trabelsi, Officer; Frank Wagner, Officer; Justin Willms, Officer; Oceanside, City of, Mayor, Chief Executive Officer

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?