Foley v. Oceanside Police Department et al
Filing
114
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff's objections; (3) And Grants the motionto dismiss With Prejudice. Judgment shall be entered for defendants. It Is So Ordered. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jjg)
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Gregory D. Foley
Civil Action No. 15-cv-01627-CAB-AGS
Plaintiff,
V.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
See Attachment
Defendant.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried
or heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Court: (1) Adopts the Report in full; (2) Rejects Plaintiff’s objections; (3) And Grants the motion
to dismiss With Prejudice. Judgment shall be entered for defendants. It Is So Ordered.
Date:
3/19/18
CLERK OF COURT
JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court
By: s/ J. Gutierrez
J. Gutierrez, Deputy
United States District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(ATTACHMENT)
Civil Action No. 15-cv-1627-CAB-AGS
Defendants
DOES 1-12; Corey Kaldenbach; Mark Lavake; Larry Weber; Leonard John Cosby; Jonathan Kislingbury;
Jennifer Luecht; Steve Stracke; Ronald Nevares; Mark Wheeler; Samuel Hay, Officer; Anis Trabelsi, Officer;
Frank Wagner, Officer; Justin Willms, Officer; Oceanside, City of, Mayor, Chief Executive Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?