Textron Financial Corporation v. Gallegos

Filing 207

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that SPE LO's request for a show-cause order be denied. Objections to R&R due by 7/17/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 6/30/2017.(lrf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Textron Financial Corp., 12 13 14 Case No.: 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS Plaintiff, v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A SHOW-CAUSE ORDER Michael S. Gallegos, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Defendant Michael Gallegos owes plaintiff nearly $22 million. While Gallegos 18 claims poverty, plaintiff says that Gallegos is using his businesses to fund a posh lifestyle, 19 including a $7 million mansion, luxury cars, and college expenses for two daughters. To 20 help collect the debt, the Court assigned Gallegos’s interests in various businesses to 21 plaintiff and warned Gallegos not to “evade payment.” (ECF No. 191, at 2.) Thereafter, 22 Gallegos shuttled money from one of these businesses to another company he co-owns. 23 That company—which was not listed in the assignment order—paid the lease on his 24 personal Mercedes Benz. 25 This shell game is proper, contends Gallegos, because no business covered by the 26 assignment order directly paid him. And plaintiff is only entitled to such direct payments, 27 28 Page 1 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS 1 or so the argument goes.1 Plaintiff finds this argument unconvincing and moves for a show- 2 cause hearing to determine if Gallegos is in contempt. 3 Gallegos’s actions are gravely troubling. His businesses appear to pay his expenses, 4 yet he draws no salary, which would be subject to garnishment by creditors (and taxation). 5 He should pay his debts or pay for his debt-dodging. But the current assignment order— 6 agreed to jointly by the parties—may lay an imperfect foundation for criminal contempt 7 on these facts. To eliminate any wiggle room, this Court recommends modifying that order 8 as follows: 9 AMENDED ASSIGNMENT ORDER 10 11 1. For purposes of this amended assignment order, the following definitions apply: 12 a. Payment: A “payment” refers to the transfer of any thing of value 13 (including but not limited to money, securities, valuables, and credit), except for a bona 14 fide salary for defendant Michael Gallegos. The term “payment” includes both direct and 15 indirect transfers. 16 17 18 b. Personal expenses: The term “personal expenses” includes expenses for Gallegos himself as well as for his immediate family. 2. Plaintiff SPE LO Holdings, LLC, is assigned Gallegos’s interests in any 19 payment from any entity listed in the attached Appendix. SPE LO is entitled to any payment 20 these entities make—or would otherwise make—that is: (a) directly to Gallegos; or (b) for 21 Gallegos’s personal expenses; or (c) to any intermediary so that another may ultimately 22 make a payment directly to Gallegos or for Gallegos’s personal expenses. 23 24 3. Gallegos must immediately report to SPE LO the amount and source of any salary he is currently receiving. This is a continuing duty, so Gallegos must also 25 26 27 1 28 Gallegos admits that one business improperly paid him $250 after his interest in that payment was assigned to plaintiff, but claims it was due to a clerical error. Page 2 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS 1 immediately report any changes to his salary, such as a new salary source or any changed 2 salary amount. 3 4. Gallegos shall not cause or encourage any entity listed in the attached 4 Appendix to make a payment: (a) to him directly; or (b) for his personal expenses; or (c) to 5 any intermediary so that another may ultimately make a payment directly to Gallegos or 6 for Gallegos’s personal expenses. 7 5. If any entity listed in the attached Appendix fails to provide SPE LO a 8 payment to which it is entitled as described above, Gallegos must immediately cause the 9 assignment and transfer of that payment to SPE LO. 10 6. Gallegos must immediately provide each entity listed in the attached 11 Appendix with a copy of this amended assignment order and inform each such entity of its 12 obligation to immediately re-direct the payments described above to SPE LO. 13 14 7. Gallegos is warned that if he violates this or any other Court order, the case may be referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for a criminal contempt prosecution. 15 16 17 * * * * * In light of the foregoing, this Court recommends that SPE LO’s request for a showcause order be DENIED. 18 Within five calendar days of the District Judge’s adoption of the foregoing proposed 19 amended assignment order or issuance of a different amended assignment order, Gallegos 20 must file with this Court a notarized verification that he has read that amended assignment 21 order in its entirety (including any Appendix), that he fully understands it, and that he 22 agrees to obey it. That verification must be signed by Gallegos personally, under penalty 23 of perjury, in the presence of a notary licensed in the state of California. 24 25 Any objection to this report is due by July 17, 2017. Dated: June 30, 2017 26 27 28 Page 3 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPENDIX 1. ABQ Hotel & Waterpark Investment, LLC 2. ABQ Hotel Investment, LLC 3. ABQ Hotel Ventures, LLC 4. Advent Hotel Management Corporation 5. Alameda Hotel Investment LLC 6. Amberly Hotel Investment, LLC 7. American Property Hospitality Management, LLC 8. American Property Hospitality 9. American Property Hotel II, LLC 10. American Property Hotel LLC 11. American Property Investments, LLC 12. American Property Investors – Alexis Park, LLC 13. American Property Investors – Reid Park, LLC 14. American Property Investors-ABQ, LLC 15. American Property Investors-Knoxville, LLC 16. American Property Investors, LLC 17. American Property Management Corp. 18. American Property--Management Corporation 19. AP/APMC Management, Limited Partnership 20. AP/APMC Management II, Limited Partnership 21. APHM Cancun Hotel Management, LLC 22. APHM Carlise, LLC 23. APHM FL Hotel Management, LLC 24. APHM Hotel Management, LLC 25. APHM NM Concessions, LLC 26. APHM Sunport, LLC 27. APMC Carlise Hotel Investors, LLC 28. APMC Concessions, Inc. 29. APMC Hotel Management, LLC 30. APMC International Hotel Management, LLC 31. APMC San Diego Hotel Management, LLC 32. Arroyo Grande Inn-Vestment, LLC 33. Arroyo Hotel, LLC 34. Armada Hotel Investment, LLC 35. Avenger Hotel Management, LLC 36. Bay Area Hotel Investment LLC 37. Canton Hotel Investment, LLC 38. Charleston Hotel Management Corporation 39. Charleston Hotel Management, LLC 40. Charleston Investment, LLC Page 4 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 41. CRS Hotel Investment I, LLC 42. Coronado Hotel Management Corporation 43. Coronado Investment, LLC 44. Cumberland Hotel Management, LLC 45. Diamond Hotel Management, LLC 46. Downtown Hotel Investors, LLC 47. Downtown San Diego Hotel Investment, LLC 48. DSS Hotel Investment, LLC 49. Fine Hotels Limited Partnership 50. Front Street Hotel Investment, LLC 51. Galisteo Hotel Investment, LLC 52. Garden Hotel Investment, LLC 53. Gaudalupe Hotel Investment, LLC 54. Global Bancorp Commodities and Investments, Inc. 55. Grover Beach Inn-vestment, LLC 56. Grover Hotel, LLC 57. Harbor View Hotel Manager, LLC 58. Harbor View Hotel Ventures, LLC 59. Harbor View Investments 60. High Desert Hotel Investment, LLC 61. Jet Stream Hotel Management, LLC 62. Lamy Hotel Investment, LLC 63. Las Cruces Hotel Limited Partnership 64. Las Cruces Hotel Management Corp 65. Little Italy Hotel Investment LLC 66. LLJ Canton Vinters, LLC 67. LLJ Hotel Ventures 4, LLC 68. Market Avenue Hotel, LLC 69. Market Avenue LLC 70. Melbourne Beach Hotel LTD. Co. LLC 71. Melbourne Beach Hotel Management Corp. 72. Melbourne Beach Investment Ltd. Co. 73. Mid-Continent Hotel Management, LLC 74. Mountain Road Hotel Investment, LLC 75. Northside Hotel Investment, LLC 76. Old Town Hotel Investment, LLC 77. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - ABQ, LLC 78. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - Boerne, LLC 79. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - Fort Myers, LLC 80. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management -La Jolla, LLC 81. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - Las Vegas, LLC Page 5 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 82. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - Niagara, LLC 83. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - San Diego, LLC 84. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - SLC, LLC 85. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management - Wisconsin, LLC 86. Pacific Pearl Hotel Management, LLC 87. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Canton, LLC 88. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Niagara, LLC 89. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - NW, LLC 90. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Ontario, LLC 91. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Phoenix, LLC 92. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Scottsdale, LLC 93. Pacific Pearl Hotel Mgmt - Tulsa, LLC 94. Pacific Pearl Hotels, LLC 95. Pan American Hotel Investment, LLC 96. Passaic Investment LLC 97. Picacho Hotel Investment LLC 98. Reid Park Investors, LLC 99. Rio Grande Hotel Investment, LLC 100. Rio Rico Resort Investment, LLC 101. Rock Around the World Management, LLC 102. Rosecrans Hotel Investment, LLC 103. San Antonio Hotel Investment-GP, LLC 104. San Antonio Hotel Investment-LP, LLC 105. San Diego Harbor View Investment, LLC 106. San Diego Hotel Investment LLC 107. Sangre De Cristo Hotel Investment LLC 108. Santa Fe Hotel Investment LLC 109. Santa Fe Picacho Hotel Management Corp. 110. Sassafras Hotel Investment, LLC 111. Sawmill Hotel Investment, LLC 112. St. Francis Hotel Investment, LLC 113. Stadium Hotel Investment, LLC 114. Tampa Hotel Investors LLC 115. Tucson Hotel Investors, LLC 116. UBB Investment LLC 117. Union City Hotel Management Corporation 118. Union City Hotel, LLC 119. Union City Investment, LLC 120. Wisconsin Dells Hotel Investment, LLC 121. Wisconsin Dells Investment, LLC 122. Yakima Hotel Investment LLC Page 6 of 6 15-cv-1678-LAB-AGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?