D.C. v. County of San Diego et al

Filing 95

ORDER Following Status Conference. On 3/25/2020, the Court held a status conference. The Court sets a deadline of 4/8/2020 for the parties to file a motion to stay the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/25/2020. (tcf)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 D.C., a minor by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, HELEN GARTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Case No.: 15cv1868-MMA- NLS ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, A.B. AND JESSIE POLINSKY CHILDREN’S CENTER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, 17 18 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 On March 25, 2020, the Court held a status conference. ECF No. 94. The parties 23 had previously requested that the Court continue to stay discovery pending a potential 24 filing for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. ECF No. 90. The 25 parties filed a joint status report as to the current state of discovery in the case at the 26 Court’s request and the Court held a telephonic status conference. ECF No. 93. Pursuant 27 to the discussion during the conference, the Court finds that the request to stay discovery 28 would be more appropriately brought as a motion to stay the entire case, pending the 1 15cv1868-MMA- NLS 1 petition for cert. Accordingly, the Court sets a deadline of April 8, 2020 for the parties to 2 file a motion to stay the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: March 25, 2020 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 15cv1868-MMA- NLS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?