Sightler v. City of San Diego et al
Filing
99
ORDER Denying Chuman Certification (Dkt. 93 ). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/27/2018. (jdt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DENYING CHUMAN
CERTIFICATION [Dkt. 93]
vs.
13
14
CASE NO. 15cv2235-LAB (RNB)
DEMETRICE SIGHTLER,
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Four months ago the Court partially granted Defendants’ motion for summary
17
judgment, but denied six San Diego police officers qualified immunity. The officers appealed.
18
Demetrice Sightler now asks the Court to certify that appeal as frivolous under Chuman v.
19
Wright, 960 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1992). Chuman held that if the “district court find[s] that the
20
defendants' claim of qualified immunity is frivolous or has been waived, the district court
21
may certify, in writing, that defendants have forfeited their right to pretrial appeal, and may
22
proceed with trial.” Id. at 105. While the Court stands by its qualified immunity analysis, that
23
doesn’t mean the appeal is frivolous, or “so baseless that it does not invoke appellate
24
jurisdiction.” Marks v. Clarke, 102 F.3d 1012, 1017-18 n. 8 (1996). The motion is denied.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 27, 2018
HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?