Wheeler v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
Filing
45
ORDER re 42 Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to file under seal is granted temporarily; 2. On or before January 18, 2017, Defendant shall file either (a) a memorandum not to exceed ten pages explaining why the documents should be filed under seal, with citation to legal authority, if any; or (b) a notice that the confidential designation is withdrawn and the document(s) can be filed publicly; 3. Plaintiff may, but is not obligated to, file a memorandum not to exceed ten pages asserting her position as to whether the documents should be filed under seal; and 4. Upon receipt of the response(s) to this Order, the Court will determine whether to order that the documents be sealed permanently, or publicly filed. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/11/2017. (kcm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JANET WHEELER,
Case No.: 15-CV-2236-CAB-AGS
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
SEAL
v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
13
Defendant.
[Doc. No. 42]
14
15
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to file documents under seal
16
[Doc. No. 42] in connection with his opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary
17
judgment. Plaintiff’s only argument supporting the confidential nature of these documents
18
is that they were designated as confidential by Defendant. Consequently, the Court does
19
not expect any opposition to the motion from Defendant, who bears the burden of
20
establishing why these documents should be sealed. However, it is not obvious from the
21
contents of the documents themselves that “compelling reasons” justify sealing the
22
documents notwithstanding the “strong presumption” in favor of public access. See
23
Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (“A party
24
seeking to seal a judicial record then bears the burden of overcoming this strong
25
presumption by meeting the “compelling reasons” standard.”).
26
In light of the foregoing, the Court is disinclined to allow the documents seal-lodged
27
at Docket Number 43 to be filed under seal. Nevertheless, the Court does not want to
28
further delay this case with argument about the documents’ purported confidential nature.
1
15-CV-2236-CAB-AGS
1
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
2
1. The motion to file under seal is GRANTED temporarily;
3
2. On or before January 18, 2017, Defendant shall file either (a) a memorandum not
4
to exceed ten pages explaining why the documents should be filed under seal,
5
with citation to legal authority, if any; or (b) a notice that the confidential
6
designation is withdrawn and the document(s) can be filed publicly;
7
3. Plaintiff may, but is not obligated to, file a memorandum not to exceed ten pages
8
asserting her position as to whether the documents should be filed under seal; and
9
4. Upon receipt of the response(s) to this Order, the Court will determine whether
10
11
12
to order that the documents be sealed permanently, or publicly filed.
It is SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 11, 2017
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
15-CV-2236-CAB-AGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?