Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation v. A.O. Reed & Co., Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER: Mandatory Settlement Conference set for 1/11/2017 01:45 PM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 5/18/2016.(knb)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation,
9
Plaintiff,
10
ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SETTLMENT CONFERENCE
v.
11
Case No.: 15-cv-02503-NLS-JLB
A.O. Reed & Co., Inc.,
Defendant.
12
13
14
Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt hereby SETS the Mandatory Settlement
15
Conference (“MSC”) for January 11, 2017, at 1:45 PM in the Chambers of Magistrate
16
Judge Jill L. Burkhardt, Edward J. Schwartz U.S. Courthouse, 221 West Broadway, Suite
17
5140, San Diego, California 92101.
18
The following are mandatory directions for the parties preparing for the MSC.
19
Absent express permission obtained from this Court, and notwithstanding the
20
pendency of any motion, counsel shall timely comply with the dates and deadlines
21
ordered herein.
22
1.
Purpose of Conference: The purpose of the MSC is to permit an informal
23
discussion between the attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the
24
lawsuit in an effort to achieve a resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be
25
informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. Counsel for any non-English speaking
26
parties is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference.
27
28
2.
Personal Appearance of Parties Required: All parties, adjusters for insured
defendants, and other representatives of a party having full settlement authority as
1
15-cv-02503-NLS-JLB
1
explained below, and the principal attorneys responsible for the litigation, must be present
2
in person and legally and factually prepared to discuss settlement of the case. Counsel
3
appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority)
4
will be cause for immediate imposition of sanctions and may also result in the immediate
5
termination of the conference. If each of the principal attorneys responsible for the
6
litigation is not listed on the docket as an “ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED,” then they each
7
shall enter their appearance on the docket as soon as practicable, but in no event later than
8
ten calendar days prior to the MSC.
9
Unless there is extraordinary circumstances, persons required to attend the
10
conference pursuant to this Order shall not be excused from personal attendance. Requests
11
for excuse from attendance for extraordinary circumstances shall be filed as a motion
12
at least ten calendar days prior to the conference. Failure to appear at the MSC will be
13
grounds for sanctions.
14
3.
Full Settlement Authority Required: In addition to counsel who will try the
15
case, a party or party representative with full settlement authority1 must be present for the
16
conference.
17
corporation who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have
18
discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of the
19
Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). The purpose of this requirement
20
is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the
21
conference without consulting a superior.
In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the
22
23
“Full settlement authority” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be
authorized to explore settlement options fully and to agree at that time to any settlement terms
acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir.
1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position
of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of
requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference contemplates that the
person’s view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486. A limited or a
sum certain of authority is not adequate. See Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-97 (8th
Cir. 2001).
1
24
25
26
27
28
2
15-cv-02503-NLS-JLB
1
4.
MSC Statements Required: On or before December 30, 2016, the parties
2
shall lodge statements of five pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge
3
Burkhardt outlining the nature of the case, the claims, the defenses, and the parties’
4
positions regarding settlement of the case. The settlement position must include a specific
5
and current demand or offer addressing all relief or remedies sought. If a specific demand
6
or offer cannot be made at the time the brief is submitted, then the reasons therefor must
7
be stated along with a statement as to when the party will be in a position to state a demand
8
or offer. A general statement that a party will “negotiate in good faith” is not a specific
9
demand or offer. The statement shall also list all attorney and non-attorney attendees for
10
the Conference, including person(s) and their title(s) or position(s) with the party who will
11
attend and have settlement authority at the Conference.
12
MSC statements shall be lodged via email at efile_burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. If
13
exhibits are attached and the total submission amounts to more than 20 pages, a hard copy
14
must also be delivered directly to chambers. Whether these statements are submitted
15
confidentially or whether they are served on opposing counsel is within the parties’
16
discretion. Statements of more than five pages will not be considered.
17
5.
Requests to Continue an MSC: Local Rule 16.3 governs MSCs. Requests
18
to continue MSCs are rarely granted. However, the Court will consider formal, filed ex
19
parte or joint motions to continue an MSC when extraordinary circumstances exist that
20
make a continuance appropriate. In and of itself, having to travel a long distance to appear
21
in person is not “extraordinary.”
22
continuances will not be considered unless filed no less than ten calendar days prior to
23
the scheduled conference.
24
6.
Absent extraordinary circumstances, requests for
Settlement Prior to MSC:
The Court encourages the parties to work on
25
settling the matter in advance of the MSC. In the event that the parties resolve the matter
26
prior to the day of the MSC, the following procedures must be followed before the Court
27
will vacate the MSC and excuse the parties from appearing:
28
3
15-cv-02503-NLS-JLB
1
a. The parties may file a Joint Motion to Dismiss and separately lodge by email
2
a proposed order to the assigned Trial Judge.2 If a Joint Motion to Dismiss is
3
filed, the Court will vacate the MSC. The parties are encouraged to contact
4
Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone to notify the Court of their pending
5
Joint Motion;
6
b. If the parties settle more than 24 hours before the conference but are not able
7
to file a Joint Motion to Dismiss, they must file a Notice of Settlement
8
containing the electronic signatures of counsel for all settling parties and
9
identifying a date by which the Joint Motion to Dismiss will be filed. The
10
parties are encouraged to contact Judge Burkhardt’s Chambers by telephone
11
to notify the Court of their filed Notice of Settlement;
12
c. If the parties settle less than 24 hours before the conference, counsel for the
13
settling parties must JOINTLY call chambers and inform the Court of the
14
settlement and receive Court permission to not appear at the MSC.
After having reviewed Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules, appropriate
15
16
questions regarding this case or the mandatory directions set forth herein may be
17
addressed through a joint call by the parties to Judge Burkhardt’s law clerks at (619) 557-
18
6624. For additional information, please see Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules.
19
20
Dated: May 18, 2016
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
See Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, United States District
Court for the Southern District of California § 2(h), for the chambers’ official email address and
procedures on emailing proposed orders.
4
15-cv-02503-NLS-JLB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?