Foster v. Colvin

Filing 4

ORDER Granting 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/6/2015. (srm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANE FOSTER, 11 12 13 14 15 16 v. CASE NO. 15cv2515-GPC(PCL) Plaintiff, CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [Dkt. No. 3.] Defendant. On November 6, 2015, Plaintiff Diane Foster (“Plaintiff”) filed this action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act along with a motion to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Dkt. Nos. 1, 3). All 19 proceedings filed with the District Court require a filing fee unless the Court grants 20 IFP status, waiving the fee. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). 21 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court may waive the filing fee if a party demonstrates 22 an inability to pay by submitting an affidavit reporting all assets of the individual. 28 23 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 24 Here, Plaintiff submitted a declaration reporting that she is not presently 25 employed and she has not worked since 2006. (Dkt. No. 3 at 2.) She declares that she 26 receives food stamps and child support in the amount of $410.28 per month. (Id.) She 27 does not have any bank accounts. (Id.) She owns a 2001 Ford Explorer. (Id.) She 28 does not own any real estate, stocks, or other financial instruments. (Id. at 3.) She has -1- [15cv2515-GPC(PCL)] 1 debt in the amount of $253.58 per month. (Id.) Based on these facts, Plaintiff has 2 sufficiently demonstrated that she is unable to pay the required filing fee and meets the 3 requirements to proceed IFP. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to 4 proceed IFP. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: November 6, 2015 8 9 HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [15cv2515-GPC(PCL)]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?