Foster v. Colvin
Filing
4
ORDER Granting 3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/6/2015. (srm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DIANE FOSTER,
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
CASE NO. 15cv2515-GPC(PCL)
Plaintiff,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
[Dkt. No. 3.]
Defendant.
On November 6, 2015, Plaintiff Diane Foster (“Plaintiff”) filed this action
17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act along with a motion to
18 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Dkt. Nos. 1, 3). All
19 proceedings filed with the District Court require a filing fee unless the Court grants
20 IFP status, waiving the fee. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).
21 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court may waive the filing fee if a party demonstrates
22 an inability to pay by submitting an affidavit reporting all assets of the individual. 28
23 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
24
Here, Plaintiff submitted a declaration reporting that she is not presently
25 employed and she has not worked since 2006. (Dkt. No. 3 at 2.) She declares that she
26 receives food stamps and child support in the amount of $410.28 per month. (Id.) She
27 does not have any bank accounts. (Id.) She owns a 2001 Ford Explorer. (Id.) She
28 does not own any real estate, stocks, or other financial instruments. (Id. at 3.) She has
-1-
[15cv2515-GPC(PCL)]
1 debt in the amount of $253.58 per month. (Id.) Based on these facts, Plaintiff has
2 sufficiently demonstrated that she is unable to pay the required filing fee and meets the
3 requirements to proceed IFP. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to
4 proceed IFP.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 DATED: November 6, 2015
8
9
HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[15cv2515-GPC(PCL)]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?